... lines

At 1.117 and 1.332 MeV, resulting from the decay of its daughter nucleus ⁶⁰Co.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... important

The WW95 yields are calculated with cross section value of 1.8 mb for the neutron capture on ⁵⁹Fe, where the RHHW02 and LC03 calculations adopt a value of 3.4 mb, see Woosley et al. (2003).

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... power-law

A power-law IMF is defined (as a function of stellar mass M) as: $\Phi(M)={\rm d}N/{\rm d}M=A M^{-(1+x)}$.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... stars

In Timmes et al. (1995) a detailed model is presented for the Galactic disk, but the WW95 yields are used and no explicit mention is made of the galactic metallicity gradient. Thus, the ratio of 0.16 is obviously an underestimate, based on yields of stars with metallicity not exceeding $Z_{\odot}$.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.