![]() |
Figure 1:
Diagram of angular size vs redshift data for 145 compact radio
sources (binned into 12 bins) of Gurvits et al. (1999).
We assume the charateristic linear size
l = 22.64 h-1 pc for
theoretical curves.
The solid curve corresponds to our best fit with
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Confidence region plot of the best fit to the database of the
angular size-redshift data compiled by Gurvits et al. (1999)
- see the text for a detailed description of the method.
The 68% and 95% confidence levels in the (
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Confidence region plot of the best fit to the
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Confidence region plot of the best fit from a combined analysis
for the angular size-redshift data (Gurvits et al. 1999) and
the X-ray gas mass fractions of 9 clusters (Allen et al. 2002, 2003).
The 68% and 95.4% confidence levels in the
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |