![]() |
Figure 1:
Mass gap ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Pressure vs. baryon chemical potential ( left panel) and
energy density ( right panel)
for different values of the antineutrino chemical
potential
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Quark star configurations for different antineutrino
chemical potentials
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Quark star configurations with diquark condensation
as a function of
the central number density nq in units of the
nuclear number density n0.
The mass defect for the transition
from initial configurations with
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Mass defect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |