![]() |
Figure 1:
Equations of state of hyperonic matter calculated by
Balberg & Gal (1997); and used in this paper. Our notation is a close
analogue of that introduced by Balberg et al. (1999). Our labels
N1, N1H1, and N1H2 are their EoS1 N, EoS1 N
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
The difference between the back-bending curves J(f) and I(f).
The spin-evolution track is calculated for
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Total baryon mass ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
The enlarged region of the back-bending phenomenon
(corresponding to the box in Fig. 3). For fixed rotational frequency
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Same as in Fig. 3 but for the N1H1 EOS. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: The enlarged region of the back-bending phenomenon (corresponding to the box in Fig. 5). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Angular momentum of the star
J versus rotation frequency f, for the N2H1 EOS. Each curve
corresponds to a fixed ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: Enlargement of Fig. 7. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: Same as Fig. 7 but for N1H1 EOS. The dash-dotted line is the J(f) curve for the N1 EOS (i.e., not allowing for the presence of the hyperons). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Angular momentum of the star as a function of
frequency for the N1H1 EOS, in the region where the back-bending
phenomenon with stable termination (
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Angular momentum of a star with fixed baryon mass
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12:
Model N2H2. Baryon-mass versus circumferential equatorial
radius for fixed frequency.
The minimum for fixed
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13:
Model N2H2. The enlarged region
marked by the rectangular box in Fig. 12.
For
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |