Table 3: The compiled spectral energy distribution of Cluster 5. Aperture size are listed when appropriate (i.e. mostly for single-beam measurements). A few telescopes and filter bandwidths are missing because we were unable to find the information in the original papers.
Telescope/instrument Filter name $\lambda$ $\Delta\lambda$ Aperture Flux Source
    $\mu $m $\mu $m $^{\prime \prime }$ mJy  
HST/WFPC2 F255W 0.2574 0.041   0.179 C97
HST/WFPC2 F547M 0.5465 0.049   0.259 C97
HST/WFPC2 F814W 0.8370 0.176   0.198 C97
VLT/ISAAC $K\rm s$ 2.16 0.27   2.65 this work
VLT/ISAAC L' 3.78 0.58   77.2 this work
ISO/ISOCAM LW1 4.5 1.0   $ 125\pm30 $ this work
CTIO 1.5 4 m   7.8 0.6 8.2 $ 866\pm234$ Frogel et al. (1982)
ESO 3.6 m N1 8.3 0.85 7.5 $ 676\pm32 $ Moorwood & Glass (1982)
CTIO 1.5 4 m   8.6 1.0 8.2 $ 817\pm106$ Frogel et al. (1982)
ESO 3.6 m N2 9.4 1.65 7.5 $ 904\pm43 $ Moorwood & Glass (1982)
CTIO 1.5 4 m   9.6 0.9 8.2 $1070\pm150$ Frogel et al. (1982)
CTIO 1.5 4 m   10.0 5.1 8.2 $1300\pm80 $ Frogel et al. (1982)
    10.0 5.4 6.0 $2130\pm150$a Rieke & Low (1972)
ESO 3.6 m N 10.3 5.2 7.5 $1210\pm60 $ Moorwood & Glass (1982)
CTIO 1.5 4 m   10.4 1.8 8.2 $1540\pm170$ Frogel et al. (1982)
    10.4 1.3 8.5 $1365\pm90 $ Lebofsky & Rieke (1979)
    10.6 5 8.5 1500 Lebofsky & Rieke (1979)
CTIO 1.5 4 m   11.4 2.1 8.2 $1570\pm190$ Frogel et al. (1982)
Keck/LWS   11.7 1.0   $2200\pm200$ Gorjian et al. (2001)
ESO 3.6 m N3 12.0 3.7 7.5 $1670\pm200$ Moorwood & Glass (1982)
ISO/ISOCAM LW10 12.0 7.0   $1900\pm300$ this work
IRAS 12 12.0 7.0   $2610\pm131$b Moshir et al. (1990)
CTIO 1.5 4 m   12.4 1.3 8.2 $2040\pm450$ Frogel et al. (1982)
ISO/ISOCAM LW9 14.9 2.0   $3900\pm400$ this work
ESO 3.6 m Q 17.4 5.6 7.5 $5500\pm539$ Moorwood & Glass (1982)
Keck/LWS   18.7 0.5   $2900\pm300$a Gorjian et al. (2001)
CTIO 1.5 4 m   20.0 5.9 8.2 $6100\pm900$ Frogel et al. (1982)
  Q 21.0   6.0 $3700\pm400$a Rieke & Low (1972)
IRAS 25 25.0 11.15   $12~000\pm600$b Moshir et al. (1990)
IRAS 60 60.0 32.5   $30~500\pm1220$b Moshir et al. (1990)
IRAS 100 100.0 31.5   $29~400\pm1760$b Moshir et al. (1990)
JCMT/SCUBA   850.0 62 41 $151\pm23$c James et al. (2002)
SEST/SIMBA   1200.0 465   $71\pm4^{c}$ this work
OVRO   2600.0 22.6   <26c Turner et al. (1997)
a This measurement is not used as a constraint for the SED fit, see text for details.
b Only 75% of this flux is used as a constraint for the SED fit, see text for details.
c Corresponds to the dust-only flux, see text for details.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text