![]() |
Figure 1:
The Hertzsprung-Russell diagram with the
evolutionary tracks of hydrogen-burning AGB remnants,
computed consistently by Blöcker (1995b) for different
initial masses (3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Initial AGB wind-envelope structures:
heavy particle densities (thick), electron densities (dotted), and flow
velocities (thin) as a function of radius. Envelope and
stellar parameters are given in the individual panels.
Top: example of an AGB model with constant mass-loss rate
and wind speed (T YPE A).
Middle panels:
density structures caused by mass-loss variations
close to the tip of the AGB,
assuming a constant wind speed of 10 km s-1 (see
Blöcker 1995a, Fig. 7 therein, and
Calonaci 2000 for details).
The density modulations are signatures of the last
thermal pulses on the AGB (T YPE B).
Bottom:
density and velocity profiles resulting from full
hydrodynamical simulations along the upper AGB
(Steffen et al. 1998).
The large density trough at ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Top panels: evolutionary path for the
0.605
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Position-time diagram for sequence 3 of Table 1 where at
each time the logarithm of the normalized density
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Radial run of heavy particle density (solid), electron density
(dashed),
velocity, temperature (solid) and (thermal) pressure (dashed) for
sequence No. 3 at t=748 yr, with stellar parameters of
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Same as in Fig. 5 but for t=1 286 yr,
and
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Same as in Fig. 5 but for t=2 939 yr,
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Same as in Fig. 5 but for t=9 966 yr
and
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: From top to bottom: heavy particle densities (thick), electron densities (dotted), and flow velocities (thin) for models of the sequences Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5 of Table 1 (C ASE I) at P HASE I when the AGB wind envelopes are still neutral while the central-star winds are already ionized. Model and star parameters are given in the individual frames. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
From top to bottom: models of the sequences Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5 of
Table 1 (T YPE I) at P HASE II when the central
star is 3 000 years old and about
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11: From top to bottom: models of the sequences Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5 of Table 1 (C ASE I) at P HASE III when the central star is at the turn-around point (maximum effective temperatures of 156 000 K) after 7100 years of post-AGB evolution. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12:
From top to bottom: models of the sequences Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5 of
Table 1 (C ASE I) at P HASE IV after about
10 000 years when the central-star luminosity has approached the
beginning of the white-dwarf cooling path,
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13:
Models of sequences Nos. 11 and 12 at three evolutionary stages.
Line types are the same as before: particle densities (thick),
electron densities (dotted), and flow velocities (thin). Note the
different range of the radial scales and the flow velocities.
Top: compression phase at
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14:
Models of sequences Nos. 21 and 22 at three evolutionary phases.
Top:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 15:
Nebular structures at
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 16:
P HASE II as in Fig. 15, but for lower stellar
masses, from M=0.696 ( top), M=0.625 ( middle)
to
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 17:
Position-time diagram of seq. No. 8 (
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 18:
Same as in Fig. 17, but for seq. No. 9
(
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 19:
Same as in Fig. 17, but for seq. No. 7
(
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 20:
Same as in Fig. 17, but for seq. 6, the detailed
hydrodynamic treatment of the AGB wind envelope for
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 21: Density and velocity structure for various snapshots along sequence No. 6 shown in Fig. 20. The stellar parameters are given in the individual panels. The models selected are for a still optical thick case ( top), for the turn-around position ( next to top), during the recombination phase ( next to bottom), and for a very late, reionized stage ( bottom). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 22: Expansion properties of the "rim'' for seq. No. 6 (hydrodynamical simulation). Shown are the speeds of the contact discontinuity (dotted) and of the leading shock front (dashed) vs. time, together with the "Doppler'' velocity (thick). The latter is the mean flow velocity within the "rim'', weighted along the central line of sight by density squared and corresponds to the value one would derive from the Doppler split of emission lines. The somewhat erratic velocity changes of the shock front are due to numerical problems in finding the exact shock position. Below 3000 yrs the resp. velocities are not plotted because the whole model is optically thick and the double-shell structure not well developed. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 23:
Surface-brightness in H![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 24:
"Shell'' radii, ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |