Table 3: Quantities temporally averaged at the outer boundary for models P13C16U6, P13C14U4, and P10C18U4 (see Sect. 3). Physical features of the different versions of the model are indicated with the model name in the first column. Drift models are denoted by a ``d'' and PC models by a ``p''. Moreover a ``v'' indicates the use of the ``relative'' velocity given in Eq. (12), and an ''s'' the use of non-thermal sputtering. An unused feature is indicated by an ``_''. The following columns give the mean mass loss rate $\ensuremath{\langle\dot{M}\rangle}$ , the mean terminal velocity $\ensuremath{\langle u_{\infty}\rangle}$ , the mean degree of condensation $\ensuremath{\langle f_{\mathrm{cond}}\rangle}$ , the mean dust/gas density ratio $\ensuremath{\langle\ensuremath{\rho_{\mathrm{d}}/\rho}\rangle}$ , and the mean drift velocity $\ensuremath{\langle v_{\mathrm{D}}\rangle}$ , respectively. In addition the standard deviation ( $\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}}$ ) and the relative fluctuation amplitude $r\,(=\!\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}} /q)$ are specified for each quantity (q). The values shown in bold face of the quantities of the -dv_ and -dvs models indicate that they differ significantly (by $\ge 10\%$ ) from the corresponding values of the -d__ models. All models show an irregular temporal variability.
model              10⁶ $\ensuremath{\langle\dot{M}\rangle}$ $\ensuremath{\langle u_{\infty}\rangle}$ $\ensuremath{\langle f_{\mathrm{cond}}\rangle}$ $\ensuremath{\langle\ensuremath{\rho_{\mathrm{d}}/\rho}\rangle}$ $\ensuremath{\langle v_{\mathrm{D}}\rangle}$

             $[M_{\hbox{$\odot$ }}\,\mbox{yr}^{-1}]$ $[\ensuremath{\,\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}} ]$ $[\%]$ [10^-4] $[\ensuremath{\,\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}} ]$

             ( $\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}}$ ) r ( $\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}}$ ) r ( $\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}}$ ) r ( $\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}}$ ) r

P13C16U6-p__              3.9 (0.51) 0.13 14 (0.23) 0.016 21 (9.6) 0.46 7.3 (0.33) 0.045 -

P13C16U6-d__              4.2 (3.0) 0.71 14 (0.93) 0.066 19 (21) 1.1 9.3 (23) 2.5 4.1

P13C16U6-dv_              4.3 (3.2) 0.67 19 (1.3) 0.068 33 (32) 0.97 26 (93) 3.5 4.0

P13C16U6-dvs              4.1 (3.4) 0.83 19 (1.4) 0.074 32 (35) 1.1 26 (82) 3.2 6.6

P13C14U6-p__              4.7 (2.3) 0.49 10 (0.76) 0.076 26 (2.7) 0.10 6.0 (0.61) 0.10 -

P13C14U6-d__              1.9 (2.0) 1.1 7.5 (1.5) 0.20 24 (24) 1.0 8.4 (30) 3.6 10

P13C14U6-dvs              1.9 (1.5) 0.79 8.4 (3.4) 0.40 39 (25) 0.64 11 (19) 1.7 8.4

P10C18U4-p__              1.1 (0.49) 0.45 14 (0.77) 0.055 16 (2.6) 0.16 7.2 (1.2) 0.17 -

P10C18U4-d__              0.82 (0.12) 0.15 11 (0.24) 0.022 12 (5.3) 0.44 5.4 (2.9) 0.54 4.5

P10C18U4-dvs              0.81 (0.32) 0.40 19 (0.50) 0.026 46 (21) 0.46 21 (14) 0.67 7.0

**Table 3:** Quantities temporally averaged at the outer boundary for models P13C16U6, P13C14U4, and P10C18U4 (see Sect. 3). Physical features of the different versions of the model are indicated with the model name in the first column. Drift models are denoted by a ``d'' and PC models by a ``p''. Moreover a ``v'' indicates the use of the ``relative'' velocity given in Eq. (12), and an ''s'' the use of non-thermal sputtering. An unused feature is indicated by an ``_''. The following columns give the mean mass loss rate $\ensuremath{\langle\dot{M}\rangle}$ , the mean terminal velocity $\ensuremath{\langle u_{\infty}\rangle}$ , the mean degree of condensation $\ensuremath{\langle f_{\mathrm{cond}}\rangle}$ , the mean dust/gas density ratio $\ensuremath{\langle\ensuremath{\rho_{\mathrm{d}}/\rho}\rangle}$ , and the mean drift velocity $\ensuremath{\langle v_{\mathrm{D}}\rangle}$ , respectively. In addition the standard deviation ( $\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}}$ ) and the relative fluctuation amplitude $r\,(=\!\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}} /q)$ are specified for each quantity (q). The values shown in bold face of the quantities of the -*dv_* and -*dvs* models indicate that they differ significantly (by $\ge 10\%$ ) from the corresponding values of the -*d__* models. All models show an irregular temporal variability.
model	10⁶ $\ensuremath{\langle\dot{M}\rangle}$			$\ensuremath{\langle u_{\infty}\rangle}$			$\ensuremath{\langle f_{\mathrm{cond}}\rangle}$		$\ensuremath{\langle\ensuremath{\rho_{\mathrm{d}}/\rho}\rangle}$		$\ensuremath{\langle v_{\mathrm{D}}\rangle}$
	$[M_{\hbox{$\odot$ }}\,\mbox{yr}^{-1}]$			$[\ensuremath{\,\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}} ]$			$[\%]$		[10^-4]		$[\ensuremath{\,\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}} ]$
		( $\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}}$ )	r			( $\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}}$ )	r		( $\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}}$ )	r			( $\ensuremath{\sigma_{\mathrm{s}}}$ )	r
P13C16U6-p__	3.9	(0.51)	0.13		14	(0.23)	0.016	21	(9.6)	0.46		7.3	(0.33)	0.045	-
P13C16U6-d__	4.2	(3.0)	0.71		14	(0.93)	0.066	19	(21)	1.1		9.3	(23)	2.5	4.1
P13C16U6-dv_	4.3	(3.2)	0.67		19	(1.3)	0.068	33	(32)	0.97		26	(93)	3.5	4.0
P13C16U6-dvs	4.1	(3.4)	0.83		19	(1.4)	0.074	32	(35)	1.1		26	(82)	3.2	6.6
P13C14U6-p__	4.7	(2.3)	0.49		10	(0.76)	0.076	26	(2.7)	0.10		6.0	(0.61)	0.10	-
P13C14U6-d__	1.9	(2.0)	1.1		7.5	(1.5)	0.20	24	(24)	1.0		8.4	(30)	3.6	10
P13C14U6-dvs	1.9	(1.5)	0.79		8.4	(3.4)	0.40	39	(25)	0.64		11	(19)	1.7	8.4
P10C18U4-p__	1.1	(0.49)	0.45		14	(0.77)	0.055	16	(2.6)	0.16		7.2	(1.2)	0.17	-
P10C18U4-d__	0.82	(0.12)	0.15		11	(0.24)	0.022	12	(5.3)	0.44		5.4	(2.9)	0.54	4.5
P10C18U4-dvs	0.81	(0.32)	0.40		19	(0.50)	0.026	46	(21)	0.46		21	(14)	0.67	7.0

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text