![]() |
Figure 1: Light curves for PN (upper panel) and, for comparison, of the MOS 1 (lower panel) in the band [10-12] keV and the intensity filters we use. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: XMM-Newton EPIC image of the cluster A3528 in the band [0.5-10.0] keV. The bright sources detected by the pipeline processing of the image are masked. Notice the high concentration of these X-ray emitting point sources in the region lying between the two clumps. None of these have an associated redshift. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
XMM-Newton contour plots of the EPIC image of the cluster A3528
in the band [0.5-10.0] keV superposed on the DSS image, in the Bj band,
of the same
field of view. The contours are spaced by a factor of ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
The regions used for the detection of the diffuse emission
between the two clumps are here superimposed on the total EPIC raw image.
The width of the strip is of 13.2 pixels ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Left: adaptively smoothed exposure-corrected EPIC image
of A3528 in the soft ([0.5-2.0] keV; top panel),
medium ([2.0-4.5] keV, middle panel) and hard band
([4.5-8.0] keV, bottom panel).
Right count rates in the regions defined in Fig. 4 and
obtained in the soft ([0.5-2.0] keV; top panel),
medium ([2.0-4.5] keV; middle panel) and hard ([4.5-8.0] keV;
bottom panel) band. The error bars are the 1![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Temperature map obtained by using 5 X-ray colours
(0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.4, 1.4-2.0, 2.0-4.5, 4.5-8.0 keV)
and estimating the expected count rate with XSPEC for a
thermal MEKAL model, with fixed Galactic absorption
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Temperature ( upper panels) and metal abundance
( lower panels) profiles for A3528-N and A3528-S.
The dots show the best-fit results, while the squares
are the deprojected values.
The horizontal bars represent the width of the bins used to
extract the counts and the dotted line indicates the temperature
value from a spatially integrated fit. Uncertainties are at the 68% level
for one interesting parameter (
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: EPIC temperature map (left) and abundance map (right). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Gas temperature ( upper panels) and metal abundance ( lower panels)
profiles measured in ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Isodensity distribution of the light in the A3528-N and A3528-S
region, from the COSMOS/UKSTJ galaxy catalogue, over plotted onto the X-ray
image. These contours
have been calculated by summing the galaxy luminosities in bins
of ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Mass profiles of A3528-N and A3528-S
( points: from hydrostatic equation applied to the spectral deprojected
results; dashed lines: ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12:
Residuals above 2 in the X-ray brightness
distribution. Given two regions, A and B, of
(length, width) = (2 pixels
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.1: Joint fit of the two M1 (in black) and M2 (in red) spectra of A3528-N. Residuals are evident in the soft (0.5-2.0 keV) band. |
![]() |
Figure C.2: Same symbols as in Fig. C.1 for radial profiles. |