![]() |
Figure 1:
Diffraction-limited 2.29 ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Upper panel: observed visibility as a function of
projected baseline. The full line is the best fit LTE wind model to
the VLTI observations. The dashed line is the best fit non-LTE
radiative transfer model to the observed visibilities. Lower
panel: variation of FWHM fitted to the visibility of ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Allowed ranges in mass loss rate and wind clumping factor for the LTE wind model (contours) and the full non-LTE radiative transfer model
applied to the Hubble Space Telescope spectra
(Hillier et al. 2001) (dashed line). Both data sets agree for a
mass loss rate of
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |