Table 2: Predicted flux equivalent widths (in pm = 10 mÅ) for the 670.8 nm line in the Sun, HD 140283 and HD 84937 based on 1D and 3D models, in both LTE and non-LTE. Results are shown for various model atoms as described in the text. Note that the 3D results shown are based on only one snapshot and hence are not appropriate for a direct comparison with the 1D cases.
1D 3D

Star Parameters $\log \epsilon_{\rm Li}$ $W_\lambda^{\rm LTE}$ $W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$ $W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$ $W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$ $W_\lambda^{\rm LTE}$ $W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$ $W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$ $W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$

$T_{\rm eff}$ $\log g$ [Fe/H] noH wH w0.5H noH wH w0.5H

[K] [cm s^-2] [pm] [pm] [pm] [pm] [pm] [pm] [pm] [pm]

Sun 5777 4.44 0.0 1.1 0.40 0.34 0.38 0.37 0.55 0.37 0.40 0.39

HD 140283 5690 3.87 -2.5 1.8 2.40 2.18 2.66 2.61 3.84 1.96 2.35 2.32

HD 84937 6330 4.04 -2.25 2.0 1.31 1.44 1.57 1.55 1.79 1.11 1.26 1.24

**Table 2:** Predicted flux equivalent widths (in pm = 10 mÅ) for the 670.8 nm line in the Sun, HD 140283 and HD 84937 based on 1D and 3D models, in both LTE and non-LTE. Results are shown for various model atoms as described in the text. Note that the 3D results shown are based on only one snapshot and hence are not appropriate for a direct comparison with the 1D cases.
					1D	3D
Star	Parameters	$\log \epsilon_{\rm Li}$	$W_\lambda^{\rm LTE}$	$W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$	$W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$	$W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$	$W_\lambda^{\rm LTE}$	$W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$	$W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$	$W_\lambda^{\rm NLTE}$
	$T_{\rm eff}$	$\log g$	[Fe/H]			`noH`	`wH`	`w0.5H`		`noH`	`wH`	`w0.5H`
	[K]	[cm s^-2]			[pm]	[pm]	[pm]	[pm]	[pm]	[pm]	[pm]	[pm]
Sun	5777	4.44	0.0	1.1	0.40	0.34	0.38	0.37	0.55	0.37	0.40	0.39
HD 140283	5690	3.87	-2.5	1.8	2.40	2.18	2.66	2.61	3.84	1.96	2.35	2.32
HD 84937	6330	4.04	-2.25	2.0	1.31	1.44	1.57	1.55	1.79	1.11	1.26	1.24

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text