![]() |
Figure 1:
Spectra from our standard model with ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Intensity distributions of our standard model at ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
The influence of the Razin effect on synthetic synchrotron
spectra using the standard model at ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
The effect of SSA on synthetic synchrotron spectra using
the standard model at ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
The effect of separation on synchrotron spectra using the
standard model at ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: The effect of separation on the synchrotron luminosity for a power-law electron energy distribution in the optically thin regime. Shown are the data points at four frequencies: 1.6 (solid), 5.0 (dotted), 8.3 (dashed), 14.6 GHz (dot-dashed). The slope of this log-log plot is -1/2, as expected. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
The effect of separation on the free-free opacity
within the wind-wind collision region, using the standard model at ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
The effect of separation on the synchrotron emission using
the standard model at ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Intensity distributions at 1.6 GHz and ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
The effect of free-free opacity as a function of
inclination angle on the synchrotron spectra of the standard
model with
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
The 1.6-GHz intensity distribution for a model with
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12:
The effect of SSA on the spectrum of the emission emerging
from the shocked region as a function of inclination angle for
the standard model with
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13:
The change in thermal flux as a function of inclination angle
using the standard model with
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14:
The synchrotron spectrum of WR 147 as deduced by several
authors - solid squares (two separate estimates from the same
observational data by Skinner et al. 1999), solid pentagons
(Setia Gunawan et al. 2001), open circles (fluxes from
Churchwell et al. 1992 and Contreras & Rodríguez 1999). The flux at both 22 and 43 GHz is highly uncertain, with the latter estimated from a
long extrapolation of a power-law fit to the lower frequency
"thermal'' data points to be ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 15:
Model synchrotron spectra when SSA, the Razin effect and
free-free absorption in the circum-binary stellar wind envelope are
included, for various inclination angles: 0 (solid), ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 16:
The spectrum of WR 147. The synchrotron data are those
shown in Figs. 14 and 15 and
represented by solid data points. The total flux as deduced by the
same authors are represented by the hollow data points. The lines are
the total (solid), thermal (dotted) and synchrotron (dot-dashed)
spectra of the ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 17:
Intensity distributions at 4.8 (left) and 1.6 GHz (right)
of our WR 147 model at ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.1: Geometry for solving a line of sight through a grid in cylindrical polar coordinates. |