Table 1: Error budget of distance moduli based on the Main Sequence Fitting Method before and after this paper.

Effect/involved error
$\Delta(m-M)$ $\Delta(m-M)$
  Before After
Local sample properties
Parallax error $\pm 0.01$ $\pm 0.01$
Malmquist bias negligible negligible
Lutz-Kelker correction $\pm 0.02$ $\pm 0.02$
Binary contamination
Field binaries $\pm 0.02$ $\pm 0.02$
Cluster binaries $\pm 0.02$ $\pm 0.02$
Systematic differences
Phot. calibrations (0.01 mag) $\pm 0.04$ $\pm 0.04$
Reddening scale (0.015 mag) $\pm 0.07$ $\pm 0.035$
Metallicity scale (0.1 dex) $\pm 0.08$ (*)
Total Uncertainty $\pm 0.12$ $\pm 0.07$

(*) The effect of an error in the metallicity were included into the error bar due to reddening (see text).

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text