Table 2: Best fit parameters for the pn/PDS simultaneous observation. Th absorbing column density was fixed to that of our Galaxy, the intrinsic width of the lines was kept at the value of 1 eV because they are unresolved and a value of $i=30\hbox {$^\circ $ }$ was adopted for the unconstrained inclination angle (see text for details).
$\Gamma$ $1.69\pm0.04$

$E_{\rm c}$ (keV) $\rm 95^{+75}_{-45}$

R <0.20

E₁ (keV) $6.39\pm0.01$

EW₁ (eV) $\rm 81^{+16}_{-12}$

F₁ (10^-5 ph cm² s^-1) $\rm 1.9^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$

E₂ (keV) $\rm 6.65^{+0.04}_{-0.06}$

EW₂ (eV) $\rm 25^{+10}_{-13}$

F₂ (10^-5 ph cm² s^-1) $0.6\pm0.3$

E₃ (keV) $\rm 6.94^{+0.05}_{-0.10}$

EW₃ (eV) $22\pm14$

F₃ (10^-5 ph cm² s^-1) $0.5\pm0.3$

$F{_{{\rm 2-10~keV}}}$ (10^-11 cgs) 2.2

$\chi^2$ /d.o.f. 173/177

**Table 2:** Best fit parameters for the pn/PDS simultaneous observation. Th absorbing column density was fixed to that of our Galaxy, the intrinsic width of the lines was kept at the value of 1 eV because they are unresolved and a value of $i=30\hbox {$^\circ $ }$ was adopted for the unconstrained inclination angle (see text for details).
$\Gamma$	$1.69\pm0.04$
$E_{\rm c}$ (keV)	$\rm 95^{+75}_{-45}$
R	<0.20
E₁ (keV)	$6.39\pm0.01$
EW₁ (eV)	$\rm 81^{+16}_{-12}$
F₁ (10^-5 ph cm² s^-1)	$\rm 1.9^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$
E₂ (keV)	$\rm 6.65^{+0.04}_{-0.06}$
EW₂ (eV)	$\rm 25^{+10}_{-13}$
F₂ (10^-5 ph cm² s^-1)	$0.6\pm0.3$
E₃ (keV)	$\rm 6.94^{+0.05}_{-0.10}$
EW₃ (eV)	$22\pm14$
F₃ (10^-5 ph cm² s^-1)	$0.5\pm0.3$
$F{_{{\rm 2-10~keV}}}$ (10^-11 cgs)	2.2
$\chi^2$ /d.o.f.	173/177

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text