Table 2: Net fluxes for the dust emission by the entire galaxy used for the modeling. The values take account of all the corrections mentioned in the text. ^a Madden et al. (2003), ^b Hunter et al. (1989a), ^c Hunter et al. (1989b), ^d Stickel et al. (2000) & full catalog in prep., ^e this paper, ^f Lisenfeld et al. (2002).
Instrument ${\lambda\; (\mu }$ m) ${\Delta\lambda\; (\mu }$ m) Net flux (mJy)

ISOCAM 8.8 0.05 $(370\pm 220)^a$

10.1 0.96 $(480\pm 230)^a$

10.8 0.87 $(610\pm 210)^a$

11.8 0.73 $(860\pm 220)^a$

12.1 0.69 $(980\pm 220)^a$

13.2 0.54 $(1070\pm 220)^a$

13.9 0.45 $(1270\pm 230)^a$

14.6 0.35 $(1420\pm 240)^a$

15.0 0.30 $(1470\pm 250)^a$

16.0 0.16 $(1990\pm 290)^a$

IRAS 24.3 6.3 $(8550\pm 1100)^b$

62.8 19 $(48~900\pm 7000)^b$

103 22 $(54~800\pm 8000)^b$

KAO 155 30 $(36~000\pm 11~000)^c$

ISOPHOT 174 90 $(28~000\pm 9800)^d$

SCUBA 443 20 $(1280\pm 450)^e$

863 70 $(280\pm 60)^e$

IRAM 1200 200 $(190\pm 60)^f$

**Table 2:** Net fluxes for the dust emission by the entire galaxy used for the modeling. The values take account of all the corrections mentioned in the text. ^a Madden et al. (2003), ^b Hunter et al. (1989a), ^c Hunter et al. (1989b), ^d Stickel et al. (2000) & full catalog in prep., ^e this paper, ^f Lisenfeld et al. (2002).
Instrument	${\lambda\; (\mu }$ m)	${\Delta\lambda\; (\mu }$ m)	Net flux (mJy)
ISOCAM	8.8	0.05	$(370\pm 220)^a$
	10.1	0.96	$(480\pm 230)^a$
	10.8	0.87	$(610\pm 210)^a$
	11.8	0.73	$(860\pm 220)^a$
	12.1	0.69	$(980\pm 220)^a$
	13.2	0.54	$(1070\pm 220)^a$
	13.9	0.45	$(1270\pm 230)^a$
	14.6	0.35	$(1420\pm 240)^a$
	15.0	0.30	$(1470\pm 250)^a$
	16.0	0.16	$(1990\pm 290)^a$
IRAS	24.3	6.3	$(8550\pm 1100)^b$
	62.8	19	$(48~900\pm 7000)^b$
	103	22	$(54~800\pm 8000)^b$
KAO	155	30	$(36~000\pm 11~000)^c$
ISOPHOT	174	90	$(28~000\pm 9800)^d$
SCUBA	443	20	$(1280\pm 450)^e$
	863	70	$(280\pm 60)^e$
IRAM	1200	200	$(190\pm 60)^f$

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text