Table 2: Effective temperature and surface gravity determinations.
Star $T_{\rm eff}$ (K) ${\rm Log}~ g$ Method

$\theta$ And 8968 3.87 Napiwotzki et al. (1993) with $uvby\beta$ photometry

9000 4.00 Spectrophotometry and H $\gamma$ profile fitting, solar model

$\epsilon$ Del 13755 3.65 Napiwotzki et al. (1993) with $uvby\beta$ photometry

13679 3.65 same with correction from Adelman et al. (2002)

13679 3.65 same with H $\beta$ fitting

$\epsilon$ Aqr 9229 3.56 Napiwotzki et al. (1993) with $uvby\beta$ photometry

9200 3.50 Spectrophotometry and H $\gamma$ profile fitting, solar model

9050 3.75 Spectrophotometry and H $\gamma$ profile fitting, solar model, iron equilibrium

$\iota$ And 11845 3.35 Napiwotzki et al. (1993) with $uvby\beta$ photometry

11600 3.35 Spectrophotometry and H $\beta$ profile fitting, solar model

**Table 2:** Effective temperature and surface gravity determinations.
Star	$T_{\rm eff}$ (K)	${\rm Log}~ g$	Method
$\theta$ And	8968	3.87	Napiwotzki et al. (1993) with $uvby\beta$ photometry
	9000	4.00	Spectrophotometry and H $\gamma$ profile fitting, solar model
$\epsilon$ Del	13755	3.65	Napiwotzki et al. (1993) with $uvby\beta$ photometry
	13679	3.65	same with correction from Adelman et al. (2002)
	13679	3.65	same with H $\beta$ fitting
$\epsilon$ Aqr	9229	3.56	Napiwotzki et al. (1993) with $uvby\beta$ photometry
	9200	3.50	Spectrophotometry and H $\gamma$ profile fitting, solar model
	9050	3.75	Spectrophotometry and H $\gamma$ profile fitting, solar model, iron equilibrium
$\iota$ And	11845	3.35	Napiwotzki et al. (1993) with $uvby\beta$ photometry
	11600	3.35	Spectrophotometry and H $\beta$ profile fitting, solar model

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text