Table 2: Sample of B3-VLA quasars studied: results of the analysis.
Object z $S_{\rm 408}$ $\alpha_{\rm 408}^{\rm 1460}$ Obs. K mag $\chi^2/\nu$ $P_{\rm ext}$ % $_{\rm ext}$ Ext. $\alpha $ $P_{\rm e}$ $P_{\rm d}$ $P_{\rm e}/P_{\rm d}$ $K_{\rm HG}$ $K_{\rm nuc}$ $r_{\rm e}$
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17)
0006+397 1.830 1.15 0.66 O1 16.72 $\pm$ 0.12 1.98 95.8 19.5 Yes 0.55 48 13 3.7 18.5 $\pm$ 0.2 17.0 $\pm$ 0.2 2.39 $\pm$ 0.09
0019+431 1.050 2.22 1.34 O1 15.47 $\pm$ 0.12 0.38 90.4 5.5 No - - - - - - -
0022+390 1.932 1.10 0.10 O1 16.65 $\pm$ 0.13 8.70 99.8 41.4 Yes 0.38 84 9 9.1 17.6 $\pm$ 0.2 17.2 $\pm$ 0.1 2.00 $\pm$ 0.02
0032+423 1.588 0.92 0.94 W 16.24 $\pm$ 0.08 <0.03 90.0 <1.0 No - - - - - - -
0110+401 1.479 1.08 0.65 O1 17.13 $\pm$ 0.09 4.48 98.6 51.8 Yes 0.40 84 11 7.7 17.9 $\pm$ 0.2 17.9 $\pm$ 0.2 3.60 $\pm$ 0.02
0137+401 1.620 0.82 0.85 O1 16.94 $\pm$ 0.05 0.91 91.8 16.5 No - - - - - - -
0143+446 0.813 1.71 0.99 O1 13.99 $\pm$ 0.16 6.89 99.5 11.5 ? 0.40 84 11 7.7 16.3 $\pm$ 0.1 14.1 $\pm$ 0.2 7.09 $\pm$ 0.02
0144+430 1.790 0.92 1.01 W 16.17 $\pm$ 0.03 <0.03 90.0 15.3 No - - - - - - -
0144+432 1.260 0.82 0.70 O1 17.12 $\pm$ 0.18 8.73 99.8 80.2 Yes 0.40 84 11 7.7 17.4 $\pm$ 0.1 18.9 $\pm$ 0.4 4.45 $\pm$ 0.02
0157+442 0.721 3.26 0.91 O1 16.32 $\pm$ 0.17 18.74 99.9 83.4 Yes 0.39 84 11 7.7 16.5 $\pm$ 0.1 18.3 $\pm$ 0.4 4.09 $\pm$ 0.02
0158+394 0.780 0.12 0.18 O2 16.34 $\pm$ 0.07 5.45 99.1 6.8 No - - - - - - -
0217+417 1.430 0.85 0.94 O1 17.18 $\pm$ 0.15 2.16 96.2 <1.0 No - - - - - - -
0219+443 0.852 0.89 1.17 W 14.88 $\pm$ 0.02 2.55 96.7 42.3 Yes 0.51 61 13 4.8 15.8 $\pm$ 0.1 15.4 $\pm$ 0.1 1.73 $\pm$ 0.15
0226+467 1.216 2.45 0.93 O1 16.27 $\pm$ 0.08 8.23 99.8 44.7 Yes 0.37 84 9 9.1 17.2 $\pm$ 0.2 16.9 $\pm$ 0.1 5.25 $\pm$ 0.02
0232+411b 0.500 2.75 0.99 W 14.27 $\pm$ 0.02 7.63 99.6 34.2 Yes 0.36 84 9 9.1 15.4 $\pm$ 0.1 14.7 $\pm$ 0.1 1.44 $\pm$ 0.01
0249+383 1.120 0.95 0.34 W 16.17 $\pm$ 0.06 4.38 98.5 46.0 Yes 0.60 40 17 2.3 16.8 $\pm$ 0.1 17.0 $\pm$ 0.1 2.01 $\pm$ 0.13
0255+460 1.210 1.74 0.77 O1 17.89 $\pm$ 0.20 0.30 90.2 <1.0 No - - - - - - -
0704+384 0.579 2.87 1.06 O1 15.02 $\pm$ 0.16 17.62 99.9 33.5 Yes 0.37 84 9 9.1 16.2 $\pm$ 0.1 15.5 $\pm$ 0.2 5.91 $\pm$ 0.02
0729+391 0.663 0.26 0.43 O1 15.60 $\pm$ 0.14 20.38 99.9 91.7 Yes 0.57 48 15 3.2 15.7 $\pm$ 0.1 18.3 $\pm$ 0.2 3.77 $\pm$ 0.02
0740+380C 1.063 5.55 1.29 O2 15.62 $\pm$ 0.05 23.02 99.9 35.5 Yes 0.60 40 17 2.3 16.8 $\pm$ 0.3 16.1 $\pm$ 0.2 4.08 $\pm$ 0.08
0926+388 1.630 0.50 1.09 O2 17.09 $\pm$ 0.08 9.95 99.9 23.6 Yes 0.56 48 15 3.2 18.7 $\pm$ 0.4 17.4 $\pm$ 0.1 4.05 $\pm$ 0.14
1123+395 1.470 0.36 0.82 O2 15.72 $\pm$ 0.05 5.45 99.1 2.2 No - - - - - - -
1148+387 1.303 1.83 0.94 O2 14.93 $\pm$ 0.05 3.85 97.9 <1.0 No - - - - - - -
1206+439B 1.400 5.69 0.85 O2 15.10 $\pm$ 0.05 4.85 98.8 <1.0 No - - - - - - -
1315+396 1.560 1.16 0.49 O2 15.93 $\pm$ 0.06 4.85 98.8 28.3 Yes 0.49 61 13 4.8 17.3 $\pm$ 0.3 16.3 $\pm$ 0.1 3.20 $\pm$ 0.11
1435+383 1.600 0.54 0.85 O2 16.32 $\pm$ 0.06 4.25 98.3 <1.0 No - - - - - - -
2311+469 0.745 4.34 0.69 O1 14.79 $\pm$ 0.06 1.01 92.2 3.5 No - - - - - - -
2332+388 3.200 0.42 0.94 O1 17.66 $\pm$ 0.14 0.68 91.0 12.5 No - - - - - - -
2344+429 1.556 0.92 0.58 O1 16.30 $\pm$ 0.07 1.10 92.7 <1.0 No - - - - - - -
2349+410 2.046 1.38 0.98 O1 16.78 $\pm$ 0.18 3.18 97.5 13.8 Yes 0.48 61 13 4.8 19.1 $\pm$ 0.4 17.1 $\pm$ 0.2 3.35 $\pm$ 0.02
2351+456 2.000 2.21 0.27 O1 16.03 $\pm$ 0.16 6.39 99.4 17.9 Yes 0.39 84 11 7.7 18.0 $\pm$ 0.2 16.4 $\pm$ 0.2 2.54 $\pm$ 0.08
(1) Object name in the B3-VLA sample. (2) Object redshift (Vigotti et al. 1997). (3) Radio flux in Jy at 408 MHz. (4) Radio spectral index, $\alpha_{\rm 408}^{\rm 1460}$, defined as $S_{1460}=S_{408}\nu^{-\alpha_{\rm 408}^{\rm 1460}}$. (5) Observing run: W, September 1996, WHT La Palma. O1, October 1997, 3.5m Calar Alto. O2, February 1999, 3.5 m Calar Alto. (6) K-band aperture photometry. (7) $\chi^2/\nu$ of the surface brightness fitting to the PSF model. (8) percentage probability of being extended, derived from the previous $\chi^2/\nu$. (9) Contribution of the possible extension to the total flux. (10) Classification output (Yes = Extended, No = Not Extended). (11) Free parameter of the generalized model ($\alpha=1$ for disk galaxies, $\alpha=0.25$ for elliptical galaxies). (12) percentage probability of being an elliptical galaxy. (13) percentage probability of being a disk galaxy. (14) Ratio of both probabilities. (15) Host K-band magnitude. (16) Nucleus K-band magnitude. (17) Effective radius of the Host in arcsec.


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text