- ... revisited
- Based on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory,
La Silla, Chile.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...
![[*]](/icons/foot_motif.gif)
- Full Table 2 is available in electronic form at CDS via anonymous ftp to
cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/qcat?J/A+A/405/1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... parameters
- These parameters are: peak intensity over area,
Mean surface brightness, Peak intensity, Axis ratio,
Relative surface object/matrix, Elongation of
the matrix, Diffraction Cross.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...1992)
- The genuine magnitudes are isophotal ones but
they are (statistically) extrapolated to total magnitudes by the comparison with
Mathewson's ones. This may induce a small type dependence.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... 2MASS
- Second Release of the 2MASS survey (Jarrett et al. 2000).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...
)
- Without
rejection, the standard deviation of I(DENIS) vs. J(2MASS) is 0.3 mag.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.