![]() |
Figure 1:
The difference of the mean
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
The color residuals
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
The adopted Galactic P-C relation in (B-V)0 as
obtained from the corrected color excesses
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
The color residuals
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
The final Galactic P-C relation in (V-I)0 as obtained
from the corrected color excesses
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6a:
The Period-Color relation in (B-V)0 for Cepheids in
the Galaxy, LMC, and SMC. The Galaxy data are copied from
Fig. 3. The solid line in each panel is the mean
relation for the Galaxy from Eq. (3). Three
theoretical models by Sandage et al. (1999; SBT),
Baraffe & Alibert (2001; BA), and
Caputo et al. (2000) are compared with the mean Galaxy line in
panel (d). - The paucity of red LMC Cepheids is purely
observational due to the few available B magnitudes and saturation
effects for
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 6b: Same as Fig. 6a but for (V-I)0 colors. The Galaxy data are copied from Fig. 5. The Galaxy line in each panel is Eq. (5) of the text. |
![]() |
Figure 7b:
A comparison of the mean position in the two-color diagram
of Cepheids in the Galacty, LMC, and SMC.
The loci of differentvalues of ![]() |
![]() |
Figure 8: The provisional P-L relations in B, V, and I for Galactic Cepheids in open clusters ( left panels) and with BBW distances ( right panels). The Cepheids shown as triangles are not used for the solution; at short periods they are probable overtone pulsators (shown here with their inferred fundamental period), the three long period Cepheids with BBW distances have variable periods. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
The magnitude residuals
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
The lack of correlation with Galactic longitude for the
ratio of absolute magnitude residuals from the adopted P-L
relations in Eqs. (15-17) to the
corrected
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
The combined P-L relations in B, V, and I from 25
Cepheids in open clusters (filled symbols) and 28 Cepheids with BBW
distances (open symbols). Triangles are not used for the solution
(cf. caption to Fig. 8). - The square in the
M0V and M0I panels are from the HIPPARCOS
calibration (Groenewegen & Oudmaijer 2000). - Upper and lower
boundaries of the P-L relations are shown on the assumption
that the constant-period lines have slopes of 3.52, 2.52, and
1.94 in B, V, and I, respectively, and that the instability
strip has a width of
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12:
Color residuals
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13: Comparison of the present Galactic P-L relations in B, V, and I with model calculations (see text). BA is Baraffe & Alibert (2001). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14a: The position of 650 absorption-corrected fundamental-mode LMC Cepheids from Udalski et al. (1999b) in the P-L plane. The adopted LMC modulus is (m-M)0=18.54. Open symbols are Cepheids excluded by Udalski et al. (1999a). Overplotted are the mean Galactic P-L relations from Eqs. (15-17). |
![]() |
Figure 14b: The position of 489 absorption-corrected fundamental-mode SMC Cepheids from Udalski et al. (1999c) in the P-L plane. The adopted SMC modulus is (m-M)0=19.00. Symbols as in Fig. 14a. |
![]() |
Figure 15: The Galactic instability strip. Symbols are as in Fig. 11. The full lines correspond to Eqs. (21) and (22), respectively. Dashed lines indicate the adopted blue and red edges of the strip. Three outlying Cepheids are identified. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 16: Comparison of the instability strip position in the Galaxy, LMC, and SMC. The dashed line is the ridge line of the instability strip of LMC and SMC from Eqs. (29-32) using the Cepheids adopted by Udalski et al. (1999a). The dotted lines are from all their fundamental-mode Cepheids. The full drawn lines are the Galactic ridge lines from Fig. 15. |
Open with DEXTER |