Table 2: Detected HMXBs and candidates in the fields of the SMC observed by XMM-Newton.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
No. Obs. ID RA Dec Pos. err. Count rate Det. ML Flux
    (J2000.0) [ $^{\prime\prime}$] [s-1]   [erg cm-2 s-1]
               
01 00842008 M1 00 51 56.05 -73 41 51.4 2.1 $6.33 \times 10^{-3} \pm 1.04 \times 10^{-3}$ 84.2 $\sim$ $1 \times 10^{-13}$
02 00842008 PN 00 54 33.4 -73 41 04 $^{\diamondsuit}$ - < $2.33 \times 10^{-03~\dagger}$ 3.4 < $1.5\times 10^{-14}$
03 00842001 PN 00 54 56.02 -72 26 48.6 1.0 $3.30 \times 10^{-2} \pm 3.44 \times 10^{-3}$ 267.1 $5.3 \times 10^{-14}$
04 00842001 PN 00 56 05.24 -72 22 00.9 2.0 $7.46 \times 10^{-3} \pm 1.32 \times 10^{-3}$ 76.0 $2.4 \times 10^{-14}$
05 00842001 PN 00 57 19.58 -72 25 35.1 0.5 $8.79 \times 10^{-2} \pm 4.16 \times 10^{-3}$ 225.6 $1.4 \times 10^{-13}$
06 00842001 PN 00 57 35.71 -72 19 32.6 0.9 $3.07 \times 10^{-2} \pm 2.46 \times 10^{-3}$ 478.5 $9.5 \times 10^{-14}$
06a 01100002 PN 00 57 35.56 -72 19 36.8 2.9 $2.53 \times 10^{-2} \pm 6.94 \times 10^{-3}$ 55.9 $1.9 \times 10^{-14}$
07 01100002 PN 00 57 50.22 -72 02 37.0 0.7 $1.32 \times 10^{-1} \pm 8.75 \times 10^{-3}$ 1147.0 $2.3 \times 10^{-13}$
08 01100002 PN 00 57 50.80 -72 07 58.7 0.5 $1.79 \times 10^{-1} \pm 8.11 \times 10^{-3}$ 2798.1 $5.8 \times 10^{-13}$
09 00842001 PN 00 58 11.68 -72 30 50.4 1.7 $5.37 \times 10^{-2} \pm 8.49 \times 10^{-3}$ 120.2 $\sim$ $3 \times 10^{-13}$
10 01100002 M1 00 59 21.01 -72 23 18.4 0.8 $5.22 \times 10^{-2} \pm 3.22 \times 10^{-3}$ 1269.6 $2.3 \times 10^{-13}$
10a 00842001 PN 00 59 21.10 -72 23 15.8 0.9 $1.05 \times 10^{-1} \pm 7.23 \times 10^{-3}$ 828.9 $1.2 \times 10^{-13}$
11 01100002 PN 01 00 16.18 -72 04 45.8 1.2 $2.42 \times 10^{-2} \pm 2.86 \times 10^{-3}$ 237.5 $4.2 \times 10^{-14}$
12 01100002 PN 01 00 30.23 -72 20 35.1 3.2 $9.81 \times 10^{-3} \pm 3.00 \times 10^{-3}$ 25.8 $\sim$ $6 \times 10^{-14}$
13 01357206 PN 01 01 02.98 -72 06 59.5 2.9 $1.77 \times 10^{-2} \pm 4.16 \times 10^{-3}$ 38.2 $2.6 \times 10^{-14}$
13a 01100002 PN 01 01 03.87 -72 07 02.4 3.8 $9.16 \times 10^{-3} \pm 2.68 \times 10^{-3}$ 23.0 $3.2 \times 10^{-14}$
14 01100002 PN 01 01 20.82 -72 11 21.1 0.6 $1.40 \times 10^{-1} \pm 7.47 \times 10^{-3}$ 1689.6 $3.1 \times 10^{-13}$
14a 01357206 PN 01 01 20.87 -72 11 16.8 1.0 $8.83 \times 10^{-2} \pm 8.74 \times 10^{-3}$ 368.7 $8.5 \times 10^{-14}$
15 01357206 PN 01 01 37.56 -72 04 18.7 1.0 $5.01 \times 10^{-2} \pm 4.26 \times 10^{-3}$ 436.3 $5.7 \times 10^{-14}$
15a 01100002 PN 01 01 37.77 -72 04 22.1 1.2 $3.55 \times 10^{-2} \pm 4.36 \times 10^{-3}$ 222.7 $4.6 \times 10^{-14}$
16 01357206 PN 01 03 14.11 -72 09 14.2 0.5 $1.34 \times 10^{-1} \pm 6.38 \times 10^{-3}$ 2049.8 $3.5 \times 10^{-13}$
17 01357206 PN 01 03 37.57 -72 01 33.2 0.2 $5.09 \times 10^{-1} \pm 9.62 \times 10^{-3}$ 17172.3 $2.6 \times 10^{-12}$
18 01357206 PN 01 05 55.38 -72 03 47.9 1.6 $3.05 \times 10^{-2} \pm 3.79 \times 10^{-3}$ 119.5 $3.9 \times 10^{-14}$
Notes to Col. 2: Observation ID and the instrument with which the detection with the highest likelihood was achieved.
Notes to Cols. 3-5: Position of the XMM-Newton detections with 1 $\sigma$ statistical positional error, except for No. 02, for which the position of the optical counterpart $^{\diamondsuit}$is given.
Notes to Col. 6: Count rate for EPIC PN detection (except for entries Nos. 01 and 10 which are EPIC MOS1 detections, and $^{\dagger}$ 3 $\sigma$ upper limit for No. 02).
Notes to Col. 7: Maximum likelihood (ML) of detection for the total band (0.3-10.0 keV).
Notes to Col. 8: Flux (0.3-10.0 keV) calculated from the best fit model spectrum, setting the Galactic foreground absorption to zero. See Sect. 2.2 for used models. In order to obtain the luminosity, multiply by $4.3 \times 10^{47}$ cm2.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text