Table 1: Estimated monthly means $R_{\rm {m}}$ , their errors $\sigma _{\rm {m}}$ and relative weights $w_{\rm {m}}$ corresponding to daily sunspot observations $R_{\rm {d}}$ in 1792-1793. The best-fit Poisson distribution parameter $\mu$ is also shown. The 2-year mean has been calculated as a weighted average.
month $R_{\rm {d}}$ $R_{\rm {m}}$ $\sigma _{\rm {m}}$ $w_{\rm {m}}$ $\mu$

Jan. 92 24 26 14 0.0051 1.7

Apr. 92 96 90 24 0.0017 7

Jul. 92 0 7.3 7.7 0.0169 0.9

Oct. 92 48 50 18 0.0031 3.6

Mar. 93 48 50 18 0.0031 3.6

May 93 123 115 26 0.0015 9

Aug. 93 24,15,0,0 21.5 16 0.004 1.8

Sep. 93 5*0 5 5 0.04 0.13

Nov. 93 24 26 14 0.0051 1.7

1792-1793 16.2 7.6

**Table 1:** Estimated monthly means $R_{\rm {m}}$ , their errors $\sigma _{\rm {m}}$ and relative weights $w_{\rm {m}}$ corresponding to daily sunspot observations $R_{\rm {d}}$ in 1792-1793. The best-fit Poisson distribution parameter $\mu$ is also shown. The 2-year mean has been calculated as a weighted average.
month	$R_{\rm {d}}$	$R_{\rm {m}}$	$\sigma _{\rm {m}}$	$w_{\rm {m}}$	$\mu$
Jan. 92	24	26	14	0.0051	1.7
Apr. 92	96	90	24	0.0017	7
Jul. 92	0	7.3	7.7	0.0169	0.9
Oct. 92	48	50	18	0.0031	3.6
Mar. 93	48	50	18	0.0031	3.6
May 93	123	115	26	0.0015	9
Aug. 93	24,15,0,0	21.5	16	0.004	1.8
Sep. 93	5*0	5	5	0.04	0.13
Nov. 93	24	26	14	0.0051	1.7
1792-1793		16.2	7.6

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text