Table 2: Spectral fit results.
  Model A: phabs*(bbody) Model B: phabs*(bbody+Gaussian)
Obs.-Instrument kT $N_{\rm H}$ $\chi^2$/d.o.f. kT $N_{\rm H}$ $E_{\rm line}$ EQW $\chi^2$/d.o.f. Flux(1)
  [eV] [1020 cm-2] per instr. [eV] [1020 cm-2] [eV] [eV] per instr. [erg cm-2 s-1]

AO1-pn		 95.1 7.1 2138/309 $85.8\pm0.5$ $4.1\pm0.1$ $290\pm5$ -148 589/307 3.65 $~\times 10^{-12}$
CAL-pn =1(2) =1   =1 =1 =1 -148   3.44 $~\times 10^{-12}$
AO1-MOS1 =1 4.9 845/109 =1 $2.9 \pm 0.2$ $302\pm2 $ -159 156/108 3.33 $~\times 10^{-12}$
AO1-MOS2 =1 5.3   =1 $3.2 \pm 0.2$ =3 -159   3.62 $~\times 10^{-12}$
AO1-RGS1 103 7.1 349/221 $82.2 \pm 2.4$ $5.0\pm0.6$ =1 - 318/221 2.62 $~\times 10^{-12}$
AO1-RGS2 109 =5   $85.2 \pm 2.6$ =5 =1 -   2.50 $~\times 10^{-12}$
CAL-RGS1 112 =5   $87.8 \pm 1.6$ =5 =1 -   2.66 $~\times 10^{-12}$
CAL-RGS2 108 =5   $87.6 \pm 1.5$ =5 =1 -   2.62 $~\times 10^{-12}$

ACIS		 81.1 19 253/38 $87.8\pm1.0$ <1.6 290fixed - 91/38 3.34 $~\times 10^{-12}$
$\textstyle \parbox{17cm}{ $^{(1)}$\space Observed flux 0.1--2.4 keV; $^{(2)}$\space ''$=$$n$ '' denotes fit parameter is linked with parameter in line $n$ .}$


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text