![]() |
Figure 1: KPNO (left panel) and MSO (right panel) grey-scale time-series images of the deconvolved spectra of both components of HR 1099, for each site. The plots are residuals after subtraction of the mean profile for each data set (white features are spot transients). The vertical lines are at the v sin i of the K1 IV component. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Time-series profiles and maximum-entropy-regularized fits to the HR 1099 binary system data observed at KPNO (left panel) and MSO (right panel) during the MUSICOS 1998 campaign. The number to the right of each profile is the phase of the observation. We have plotted the spectra ordered in phase for easier comparison between them. The level of the continuum has been systematically shifted to simplify the comparison of all the profiles. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Photometric light curve of HR 1099 obtained contemporary to the MUSICOS 98 campaign. Top panel: Filled dots represent differential V-band magnitudes and open dots the maximum entropy regularized fit. Bottom panel: Residuals. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Maximum-entropy-regularized image reconstructions, for the primary component (K1 IV) of the HR 1099 system, from KPNO data. The tick marks indicate the phases of observation. Note that the longitude runs in the opposite sense to phase, with longitude 0![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Same as Fig. 4, but for the secondary component (G5 V) of the HR 1099 system. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Maximum-entropy-regularized image reconstructions, for the primary component (K1 IV) of the HR 1099 system, from MSO data. The tick marks indicate the phases of observation. Note that the longitude runs in the opposite sense to phase, with longitude 0![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Same as Fig. 6, but for the secondary component (G5 V) of the HR 1099 system. |
Open with DEXTER |