The long-term well behaved sinusoidal modulations observed in
our sample is not known to occur in other types of
blue variable stars. Here we propose as a
possible cause for the long-term oscillation the precession of an
elliptical disc around a blue star in a semi-detached binary system.
The origin of the disc ellipticity and precession
could be the tidal interaction between the disc and
the Roche-lobe filling secondary star,
in a similar way that occurs in short-orbital period dwarf novae
of the SU UMa class during superoutburst (e.g. Patterson 2001).
Star | MACHO ID | P1 (d) | P2 (d) | AI | Ab | Eb | Ab-r |
![]() |
Note |
OGLE00451755-7323436 | 212.15675.158 | 5.178(5) | 171(15) | 0.12 | 0.11 | 50350.2(8) | 0.02 | -0.35 | dw |
OGLE00474820-7319061 | 212.15847.466 | 5.497(7) | 177(10) | 0.12 | 0.10 | 50329.3(7) | - | - | dw |
OGLE00553643-7313019 | 211.16304.169 | 5.092(5) | 176(17) | 0.08 | 0.04 | 50238(1) | 0.02 | 0.53 | dw |
OGLE05025323-6909493 | 1.3686.53 | 8.025(18) | 255(30) | 0.17 | - | - | - | - | dw |
OGLE05040378-6917508 | 1.3805.130 | 6.223(7) | 207(20) | 0.11 | - | - | - | - | dw |
OGLE05060009-6855025 | 1.4174.42 | 3.849(7) | 230(22) | 0.19 | - | - | - | - | sw |
OGLE05101621-6854290 | 79.4900.185 | 4.301(6) | 319(34) | 0.06 | 0.04 | 50344(2) | 0.02 | 0.53 | sw |
OGLE05115466-6846369 | 2.5144.4555 | 9.138(2) | 361(29) | 0.26 | - | - | - | - | e |
OGLE05142677-6910559 | 79.5501.400 | 6.515(2) | 224(14) | 0.13 | 0.08 | 50430(2) | 0.04 | -0.43 | e |
OGLE05143758-6852259 | 79.5506.139 | 5.372(6) | 185(11) | 0.14 | 0.10 | 50237.3(5) | 0.03 | 0.55 | dw? |
OGLE05152654-6923257 | 79.5740.5092 | 6.292(8) | 205(15) | 0.04 | 0.04 | 50275.3(6) | - | - | dw |
OGLE05155332-6925581 | 79.5739.5807 | 7.2835(16) | 188(11) | 0.11 | 0.08 | 50254(1) | 0.03 | 0.54 | e |
OGLE05171401-6936374 | 78.5979.58 | 8.309(4) | 311(21) | 0.13 | 0.08 | 50345(1) | 0.03 | 0.48 | e |
OGLE05194110-6931171 | 78.6343.81 | 6.9044(10) | 226(13) | 0.11 | 0.06 | 50247(2) | 0.02 | 0.59 | e |
OGLE05195898-6917013 | 80.6468.83 | 2.410(10) | 140(5) | 0.06 | 0.04 | 50267.6(8) | - | - | sw |
OGLE05203325-6910146 | 80.6469.95 | 5.737(5) | 182(10) | 0.04 | 0.05 | 50357.1(8) | - | - | dw |
OGLE05260516-6954534 | 77.7426.140 | 3.632(3) | 233(15) | 0.07 | 0.07 | 50425.7(7) | - | - | sw |
OGLE05274332-6950556 | 77.7669.1013 | 7.320(11) | 227(20) | 0.05 | 0.03 | 50280(1) | 0.02 | 0.54 | dw |
OGLE05285370-6952194 | 77.7911.26 | 15.854(31) | 620(70) | 0.07 | 0.06 | 50388(2) | 0.01 | 0.67 | dw |
OGLE05294913-6949103 | 77.8033.140 | 7.184(8) | 258(20) | 0.10 | 0.09 | 50382.2(6) | 0.01 | -0.38 | dw |
OGLE05295881-6934075 | 77.8036.5142 | 5.597(4) | 179(8) | 0.12 | - | - | - | - | dw |
OGLE05313130-7012584 | 7.8269.36 | 9.231(21) | 960(176) | 0.04 | 0.03 | 51226(4) | - | - | sw |
OGLE05333926-6956229 | 81.8636.51 | 7.863(15) | 257(18) | 0.03 | 0.01 | 50335(2) | 0.01 | 0.52 | dw |
OGLE05371342-7010580 | 11.9237.2121 | 10.913(23) | 421(40) | 0.12 | - | - | - | - | dw |
OGLE05390681-7027487 | 11.9475.96 | 6.967(12) | 276(15) | 0.10 | 0.01 | 50335(2) | 0.01 | 0.52 | dw |
OGLE05390992-7019262 | 11.9477.138 | 6.632(8) | 198(15) | 0.10 | 0.05 | 50301(1) | 0.02 | 0.56 | dw |
OGLE05391746-7044019 | 11.9592.22 | 7.151(8) | 219(20) | 0.06 | 0.04 | 50401.0(8) | 0.01 | -0.49 | dw |
OGLE05410217-7011043 | 76.9842.2444 | 7.352(13) | 264(26) | 0.11 | 0.11 | 50395(2) | - | - | dw |
OGLE05410942-7002215 | 76.9844.110 | 6.586(9) | 245(23) | 0.12 | 0.09 | 50510(2) | - | - | dw |
OGLE05435003-7057431 | 15.10314.144 | 5.012(5) | 173(12) | 0.12 | 0.09 | 50250.7(7) | - | - | dw |
The 3:1 resonance between a disc particle orbiting the primary and
the binary system occurs at
,
where a is the binary separation. Elliptical orbits at this radius will experience a
dynamical apsidal advance with a period given by:
![]() |
(3) |
We have examined an alternative explanation suggested by the referee, namely,
nodal precession of a tilted disc. However,
this phenomenon seems to appear in X-ray binaries with very different
mass ratios (and different
values, e.g. Larwood 1998) and not to be confined to the low mass ratio region, as suggested by the
strong concentration of
values around 35.
Acknowledgements
We thank the referee J. Thorstensen, and also D. Sasselov, for interesting comments on a first version of this paper. REM acknowledges support by Grant Fondecyt 1030707 and DI UdeC 202.011.030-1.0. MPD thanks CNPq support under grant # 301029. This paper utilizes public domain data originally obtained by the OGLE and MACHO Projects.
Copyright ESO 2003