- ... Rezania
- Present address:
Department of Physics, University of Alberta,
Edmonton AB, Canada T6G 2J1.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...1999)
- Actually
Sedrakian et al. (1999)
have shown that even for partially pinned vortices the core and the
crust would rotate at different angular velocities.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...
acceptable
- Though such a short magnetic cycle has not been observed in neutron stars yet,
the early observations of A-type stars (
-variables),
with kilogauss magnetic
field strength, showed large amplitude, nearly symmetric magnetic reversals
in periods ranging from 4 to 9 days, close to the periods of the stars
(Babcock 1958).
Several recent observations from the young rapidly rotating stars
confirmed the existence of the solar-type magnetic cycle with
(Brandenburg et al. 1998, Kitchatinov et al. 2000).
Of course these stars presumably have active convection
zone, for the case PSR B1828-11 with proposed period for
the magnetic cycle, we have
,
which is smaller
by 5 orders of magnitude relative to one obtained for the young
rotating stars. This may agree with the fact that in
neutron stars the convective fluid motions are hardly excited.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... pulsar
- It is interesting to
note that according to the neutron star crustal tectonics
scenario the magnetic
fields in spinning down neutron stars move to achieve a right angle
configuration relative to the star's spin axis (Ruderman 1991a,b).
This is in
agreement with our analysis for PSR B1828-11 as we found
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.