The sample of 34 possible members of the CVn I cloud, which are marked
in Table 2 in bold print, are characterized by a mean distance
Mpc and a mean radial velocity
km s-1. The ratio of these quantities yields
km s-1 Mpc-1as the local value of the Hubble constant,
which agrees well with its global value,
(random)
(systematic) km s-1 Mpc-1 (Ferrarese et al. 2000).
In other words, within the uncertainties
the CVn I cloud as a whole is at rest with respect to
the global cosmic flow within random errors.
As a dynamical system, the CVn I cloud has the following integrated
parameters: a radial velocity dispersion
km s-1,
a mean projected linear radius
kpc, a mean harmonic
projected radius
kpc, and an integrated luminosity of
.
Considering the CVn I cloud
to be in dynamical equilibrium and
applying the virial relation (Limber & Mathews 1960)
Based on the present (incomplete) data on galaxy distances, we may
establish that the CVn I cloud extends in depth some 2.5-3.5 Mpc,
namely, from
Mpc to
Mpc (via the TRGB method) or
even to 6 Mpc via the less reliable distance estimates from the brightest
stars. In the projection onto the sky the most distant CVn I members are
situated at
Mpc from the center. Hence, the CVn I cloud is a
system slightly elongated in space along the line of sight.
It should be emphasized that such an extended complex of galaxies
with a low velocity dispersion (only 50 km s-1!) has not yet reached
the virialized state. The "crossing time'' of the CVn I cloud defined as
is 15 Gyr, comparable to the cosmic
expansion time. Consequently, the derived estimates of the virial/orbital
mass should be used with great caution.
What is the dynamical state of the CVn I cloud? Is it a semi-virialized
system or a structure taking part in the free Hubble flow? Figure 6
presents the distribution of galaxies in the CVn I region according to their
distances and radial velocities.
The behavior of the members of the CVn I cloud in Fig. 6 reveals an interesting
feature: all the galaxies at the front of the cloud are situated
above the Hubble regression line. That may be caused by the differential
motion of the peripheral galaxies towards the cloud center at a velocity of
65 km s-1. In the case of spherical symmetry, a similar motion of
more distant cloud members towards its center (i.e., towards us) is expected
(Tonry et al. 2000). Unfortunately, the distances to galaxies at the back
of the cloud are known so far only with large errors, and the suspected
"back-flow'' effect turns out to be very noisy. But we believe that more
accurate distance measurements for a dozen galaxies on the back of
the cloud can easily clarify whether the backflow effect exists or not.
Thus, returning to the question about the dynamical state of the CVn I cloud, we suggest that the complex of predominantly irregular galaxies shows some signs of deviation from the free Hubble expansion. But it seems to be very far from the virialized state. Presumably evolving systems like the CVn I cloud, UMa cloud, and the Cancer cluster are a common feature of the large scale structure of the universe.
It should also be noted that in the CVn I region there are some galaxies (UGC 7131, NGC 4150, KK 127, and UGC 7949) with radial velocities of 100-350 km s-1, but with distance estimates in the range of (10-20) Mpc. These objects tend to be concentrated on the southern side of the cloud, closer to the Virgo cluster. These galaxies may belong to the Virgo cluster outskirts, and their low radial velocities may be caused by large peculiar motions with respect to the Virgo core.
Copyright ESO 2003