The relatively large pixel size together with the modest spatial
resolution of the ESO 3.6 m telescope strongly limits
the deconvolution process. The marginal high-resolution that can be
achieved with the present data preferably yields a binary system, but
conversely we know that such a result can also be obtained if the
object is dumbbell shaped. Larger telescopes with a 15-25 mas/pix
scale could overcome this limitation. To illustrate this claim, we
have constructed simulated images from the NAOS/CONICA camera
(with a 13.25 mas/pixel scale) installed on the ESO VLT/UT
telescope at Paranal (Chile). Four cases are analyzed corresponding to
the dumbbell shape of Tanga et al. (2001), the two binary models obtained
(A) from the restored images and (B) from the Roche ellipsoids model
described in Sect. 2, and the "bone-shape" model of
Ostro et al. (2000). The images are obtained by convolution of these shape
models with a simulated H-band (1.64 m) NAOS/CONICA PSF
profile under an atmospheric seeing which varied between approximately
0.6 and 1.0 arcsec (Rousset et al. 1998). The set of PSF
indicates a highly stable correction of the AO system with a
Strehl ratio between 56 and 80% and a FWHM of
31.5 mas. Additional noise corresponding to photon noise and the readout
noise of the detector (with
e-) have been included in
these convolved images. Results from the restoration process with the
MLR and MISTRAL techniques are shown in
Fig. 2. We stress that the PSF applied for the
construction of the simulated image (second row of the figure) is not
used during the myopic deconvolution. Instead, we used a mean PSF estimated from several PSFs taken at different seeing
conditions for which we can also estimate the variability per element
of frequency in Fourier space (the Density Spectral Point or
DSP). Comparison of the original model (first row of the figure) with
the restored object (last three rows of the figure) shows the
advantage of the MISTRAL over the classical MLR
method. Moreover, it appears that VLT/NAOS/CONICA
observations of (216) Kleopatra would be of great value since they
could conclusively reject an incorrect shape-model. The same
procedure was applied with appropriate scaling for the apparent size
and signal-to-noise ratio to an asteroid similar to (624) Hektor
(V=14 and about half the apparent size of Kleopatra, see
Fig. 3). Here the H-band PSF is simulated for a
fainter object, and the correction is not as good as for
Kleopatra. For instance, under a seeing of 0.7 arcsec the PSF nominal Strehl ratio is 31% and its FWHM is 34 mas, but the
variation with the seeing quality is much larger (we have SR= 14% and
FWHM = 50 mas under a seeing of 0.9 arcsec). Even though the
restitution is degraded in this case, the MISTRAL
deconvolution method linked with the intrinsic resolution of the 8 m
size telescope still enables us to reveal the binary nature of close
pairs among the Trojans.
Copyright ESO 2002