Starting from the seminal paper by Baldwin 1982, models for radio source evolution have been presented by several authors which link the CSS/GPS population to the larger size sources, (see e.g. Begelman 1996; Kaiser & Alexander 1997).
All models essentially predict a decrease of the source luminosity with
time, and therefore with increasing source linear size.
A key test for the models is the ability to reproduce the distribution of
sources in the "Radio Power - Linear Size" (
)
plane
(Baldwin 1982).
CSSs/GPSs seem to be in
the right proportion as compared with model expectations (Fanti et al.
1995;
Readhead et al. 1996). However, from the samples studied so far
the statistics have been not very large and
suspicions were raised on some "irregularities" in the LS
distribution (O'Dea & Baum 1997) and on the, perhaps too high,
number of very small size CSSs, the GPSs (Polatidis et al. 1999;
Fanti & Fanti 2001).
Recently we have selected a new sample of CSSs from the B3-VLA catalogue
(Vigotti et al. 1989)
aimed at increasing significantly the statistics on sources with LS in
the range
(kpc)
(Fanti et al. 2001, hereafter referred to as Paper I). This sample,
consisting of 87 CSSs (
kpc), has VLA
observations at 1.4 GHz
(A and C configurations), 5 and 8.4 GHz (both A configuration).
About 50% of these sources were not resolved or were poorly resolved
even at 8.4 GHz
(beam size
0.2
). For them two VLBI observing
projects were undertaken with the VLBA and EVN & MERLIN.
This paper reports on the results of the VLBA observations of the most compact sources. The EVN & MERLIN observations instead are presented in a companion paper by Dallacasa et al. (2002, Paper III).
Source | Id | mR | z | LAS | Log
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
LLS | Morph. |
mas | W/Hz h-2 | mJy | mJy | mas | kpc h-1 | |||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) |
0039+373 | G | 1.006 | 100 | 27.37 | 784 | 779 | 120 | 0.50 | CSO | |
0147+400 | E | 100 | >26.6 | 631 | 563 | 95 | ![]() |
scJ?![]() |
||
0703+468 | E | 80 | >26.6 | 1392 | 1356 | 75 | ![]() |
CSO | ||
0800+472 ![]() |
E | 1000 | >26.8 | 769 | 447 | 160 | ![]() |
scJ?![]() |
||
0809+404 ![]() |
G | 0.551 | 1200 | 26.90 | 929 | 522 | 80 | 0.28 | ? | |
0822+394 | G | 1.180 | 50 | 27.33 | 1003 | 942 | 70 | 0.30 | CSO | |
0840+424A | E | 80 | >26.8 | 1243 | 1187 | 135 | ![]() |
CSO | ||
1007+422 ![]() |
E | 130 | >26.4 | 370 | 313 | 265 | ![]() |
MSO | ||
1008+423 | E | 50 | >26.5 | 521 | 498 | 115 | ![]() |
CSO | ||
1016+443 | G | 19.7 | 0.33 R | 110 | 26.11 | 287 | 266 | 155 | 0.44 | CSO |
1044+454 ![]() |
G | 24.8 | 4.10 K | 1000 | 28.82 | 352 | 311 | 175 | 0.55 | ? |
1049+384 ![]() |
G | 20.9 | 1.018 | 100 | 27.14 | 574 | 502 | 210 | 0.89 | CSO? |
1133+432 | E | 70 | >26.3 | 1247 | 1265 | 45 | ![]() |
CSO | ||
1136+383 ![]() |
E | 50 | >26.4 | 400 | 377 | 70 | ![]() |
CSO | ||
1136+420 | G | 21.7 | 0.829 | 1000 | a 26.9 | 402 | 279 | 120 | 0.49 | ? |
1159+395 | G | 23.4 | 2.370 | 50 | 27.57 | 535 | 498 | 70 | 0.26 | CSO |
1225+442 | G | 18.2 | 0.22 R | 200 | 27.50 | 316 | 291 | 420 | 0.95 | CSO |
1242+410 | Q | 19.7 | 0.811 | 40 | 27.08 | 1215 | 1126 | 70 | 0.29 | CSO? |
1314+453A![]() |
G | 21.8 | 1.544 | 160 | 27.77 | 574 | 493 | 185 | 0.79 | CSO |
1340+439 | E | 70 | >26.5 | 447 | 397 | 130 | ![]() |
CSO | ||
1343+386 ![]() |
Q | 17.5 | 1.844 | 110 | 27.70 | 793 | 717 | 130 | 0.54 | CSO |
1432+428B![]() |
E | 40 | >26.3 | 809 | 706 | 50 | ![]() |
CSO | ||
1441+409 | E | 100 | >26.7 | 834 | 768 | 130 | ![]() |
CSO | ||
1449+421 | E | 80 | >26.9 | 639 | 592 | 120 | ![]() |
CSO | ||
2304+377 | G | 19.7 | 0.40 R | 100 | 26.44 | 1299 | 1217 | 150 | 0.49 | CSO |
2330+402 | E | 70 | >26.7 | 730 | 705 | 100 | ![]() |
CSO | ||
2348+450 ![]() |
G | 0.978 | 200 | 27.36 | 630 | 520 | 310 | 1.32 | MSO | |
2358+406 | E | 80 | >26.8 | 1159 | 1161 | 120 | ![]() |
CSO |
a The value given in Fanti et al. (2001) is wrong.
|
Copyright ESO 2002