We have attempted to synthesis an observed spectral region,
covering
of the spectrum around
of the red giant R Doradus at a spectral
resolution of
-2500. The synthesised
spectrum is based on a MARCS hydrostatic model-photosphere.
We are successful in reproducing the
2.80-
region, but encounter a discrepancy
in the beginning of the spectral region of our observations;
2.6-
.
We have discussed possible explanations of this discrepancy, but have not identified the cause.
The good agreement with the medium-resolution ISO-SWS06
observations, apart from the region with the strongest water
bands, suggests the adequacy of using a hydrostatic model
photosphere for this particular star, and the completeness and
correctness of our input data in the form of the molecular opacity
for the calculation of the spectrum. Given all the possible
failures of the model to correctly describe the physical picture
of the outer photospheres of red giants, the agreement is
promising. It shows once again the accuracy and the strength of
the new MARCS code also in the infrared wavelength region.
Thus, the modeling of moderately varying red giants, such as
semi-regular variables, in the near-infrared region with
hydrostatic model photospheres may be a reasonable approximation.
Note, however, that for the very variable Mira stars in general,
hydrostatic model atmospheres certainly fail to reproduce observed
spectra (see, for example, Aringer et al. 2001). Attention
should also always be given to the extended atmospheres
of these stars,
which could affect the spectra and especially so in the infrared
wavelength region. This extended atmosphere is a possible reason
for the discrepancy in the 2.6-
region.
The spectral signatures in the spectrum presented here are mostly
due to photospheric water vapour but several photospheric CO and
OH bands are also identified. The spectral region is found to be
very temperature sensitive, leading us to an estimate of the
effective temperature of the star of
.
The best-fit synthetic spectrum was based on a model photosphere
of a surface gravity of
(cgs). The temperature
found here is slightly higher than the ones reported in the
literature. A possible reason for this is a problem with the water
vapour line list of Partridge & Schwenke (1997), as suggested by Jones et al. (2002).
Acknowledgements
We should like to thank Professors Bengt Gustafsson and David L. Lambert for inspiration and enlightening discussions and the referee for valuable comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the P. E. Lindahl Foundation Fund of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education.
Copyright ESO 2002