The extended light in ESO 342-G017 is reasonably well
fit by a thick exponential disk with nearly constant projected scale
height (hz) as a function of galactocentric radius (R) along
the major axis of the galaxy. This is illustrated in
Figs. 7 and 8, and in
Fig. 11, where the fitted values of hzfor each averaged extraction are shown in both the R and Vbands for the thick and thin exponential disk components.
The error-weighted mean of the projected scale heights are:
pc and
pc in the
R-band and
pc and
pc in the
V-band.
The projected scale length, hR, of the thin disk
is more difficult to assess, but
is estimated from the fitted values of
as a function of
position along the major axis to be about
kpc in
both bands.
The projected scale length of the
fitted thin disk is indeterminate from the V-band frames, but is
consistent, within the uncertainties, with the projected scale length of the
thin disk in the R-band.
When deprojected and deconvolved (that is,
taking into account line-of-sight effects due to the
inclination of the galaxy and seeing), the true
face-on surface brightness of the thin disk in the R-band is
mag/sqarcsec,
with a true scale height and scale length
of
pc
and
kpc, respectively.
These estimates were made by convolving model thin exponential disks
inclined at 88
with the measured PSF, and requiring that
the resulting vertical and radial profiles matched those fitted to
the observed profiles
(see Fig. 10).
The intrinsic thin disk scale heights and lengths in the V-band are
the same as those in the R-band, within uncertainties.
The projected scale height, hz,
is larger than the intrinsic value hz,0primarily due to convolution with the comparably sized PSF.
On the other hand, the projected scale length, hR, is larger
than hR,0 because of line-of-sight effects due to the
extreme inclination of the galaxy.
The thin disk has an inferred face-on surface brightness in Vof
mag/sqarcsec, implying an
intrinsic color of
for the thin disk.
Since the color is found by extrapolating the fitted
parameters into the plane of the disk, it is relatively, though
not completely, insensitive to dust and
clumpy luminosity from HII regions.
We estimate that the uncertainty in our inferred intrinsic parameters
is about 10-15%, primarily coming from uncertainties in
inclination and the fit parameters.
![]() |
Figure 10: The effect of inclination and PSF convolution on the observed radial and vertical surface brightness profiles along the major and minor axes of a thin exponential disk similar to that of ESO 342-G017. The inferred intrinsic vertical and face-on radial profiles are shown as thin dashed lines. The thick solid line indicates the result after inclination by 88 degrees and convolution with the high signal-to-noise PSF determined from isolated faint stars on the science mosaic and a bright standard star. The vertical (minor axis) and radial (major axis) profiles of an exponential thin disk with typical fitted parameters for the projected scale height, hz = 380 pc, and scale length, hR = 8.9 kpc (see Sect. 6) are shown as thin solid lines. |
The structural parameters of the
extended light are more uncertain, but also
much less affected by inclination
and seeing effects. We have not attempted, therefore, to
deproject the thick disk scale parameters, but expect that in
the R band the intrinsic scale height is
close to the projected value of
pc,
while the true scale length of the thick disk is between
6 and 9 kpc,
(the intrinsic thin disk and projected thick disk values, respectively).
The value of the central surface brightness of the thick disk
is uncertain, but can be constrained.
For a pure exponential disk, the edge-on
central surface brightness
(in linear units)
can be shown to be given by
,
where
is the face-on central surface brightness.
If we assume that the fitted value
mag/sqarcsec of the thick disk in the R-band is a good approximation to the
actual edge-on value for the
thick disk, then, based on our estimates of these quantities and
their uncertainties, we can deduce that
mag/sqarcsec.
The PSF may have a small effect that would cause the
fitted value to be higher than the actual value, in which
case these constraints would be pushed to slightly fainter magnitudes.
The detection of the thick disk in the V-band
is less secure,
both because the S/N of our relative surface brightness photometry
is lower in V and because the PSF (and thus scattered light
problems) is larger in V. Furthermore, beyond galactocentric
radii of 5 kpc, there is only a small statistical difference
in the inferred scale heights of the fitted thin and thick disks
(Fig. 11), and the extrapolated in-plane surface
brightness of the thick component in the V-band
shows no clear trend with major axis radius.
The intrinsic R-band scale heights of the thin and thick disk
components of ESO 342-G017 are similar to those of the Milky Way,
but because the intrinsic scale length of its thin disk
is larger than the commonly accepted Galactic value of
hR,0 = 3-3.5 kpc (see references in Sackett 1997),
the ratio
hR,0 / hz,0 is
50% larger for ESO 342-G017 than for the Galaxy.
Since the total luminosity of any pure exponential disk is given by
,
if the intrinsic
scale lengths of the thick and thin components are equal,
the ratio of total light in each is given by the
ratio of their intrinsic central surface brightness.
Together with the constraints on
for the two components derived
above, this assumption implies that the thick disk
contributes
20-40% of the total R-band light of ESO 342-G017, excluding
the light in individual masked HII regions.
Finally, we note that these constraints on the luminosity contribution
of the thick disk imply
a combined (thin+thick disk) face-on central surface brightness
for ESO 342-G017 of
.
Since the B - R color of the galaxy is certainly greater
than zero, and probably
0.5, this places ESO 342-G017 firmly
in the class of low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies,
which are generally defined as those
disks with B-band face-on central surface brightnesses
mag/sqarcsec (cf., de Blok et al. 1995).
Copyright ESO 2002