To further investigate the physical conditions characterizing the
central gas clouds that give rise to the observed emission, we have
plotted for our galaxy sample the [CI]/J=2-
line intensity
ratio versus the [CI]/J=4-
line ratio. For comparison purposes,
we have added points corresponding to a few Galactic starforming regions
(White & Sandell 1995; Israel & Baas, unpublished), the N 159/N 160
starforming complex in the Large Magellanic Cloud (Bolatto et al. 2000), and the Milky Way Center (Fixsen et al. 1999). As the latter do
not list
intensities, we have assumed a J=2-
intensity ratio of 8.5, which is the mean value we find for the
galaxies observed by us (Israel & Baas 1999, 2001, as well as
papers in preparation).
To put the observed points in context, we have used the Leiden radiative
transfer models to calculate the same line intensity ratio in a
grid with gas densities in the range n = 500-10 000
,
kinetic temperatures in the range
= 10-150 K and CO
column densities N(CO)/dV = 0.3, 1.0 and 3.0
respectively. We considered N([CI])/N(CO) abundance ratios
of 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 respectively. The results are shown in Fig. 4,
always assuming an isotopic ratio
= 40. Small variations
in the assumed isotopic ratio lead to small shifts in the various curves
depicted in Fig. 4, mostly along lines of constant temperature.
It is immediately clear from Fig. 4 that the predicted [CI]/
intensity ratio is roughly proportional to the
N([CI])/N(CO) abundance ratio at any given gas-density. Variation
of the actual CO column density by over an order of magnitude or
variation of the gas kinetic temperature has very little effect on the
line intensity ratio except at the highest densities and column densities
where saturation effects caused by high optical depths become dominant.
At given column densities, however, the [CI]/
intensity ratio
does depend on the gas-density and is roughly inversely proportional to
.
The [CI]/J = 4-
intensity ratio strongly varies as a
function of gas kinetic temperature and density, as well as column density.
Further inspection of Fig. 4 shows that the starforming regions in
the Milky Way and the LMC are found distributed along curves that
mark neutral carbon versus CO abundances N(C)/NCO)
0.1-0.3. The galaxy center ratios, in contrast, mostly seem
to imply significantly higher neutral carbon abundances. Only the
point representing the quiescent bulge of NGC 7331 appears to be
associated with an equally low carbon abundance. Depending on the
assumed value of the total gas density, centers of quiescent galaxies
are associated with carbon abundances N(C
)/NCO)
0.3 (
)
to 1.0 (
). This is
consistent with earlier determinations such as N(C
)/NCO)
0.8 (-0.4, +0.7) for the Milky Way (Serabyn et al. 1994).
In contrast, active galaxies
have C
column densities well exceeding CO column densities
independent of the gas parameters assumed. The diagonal distribution
of galaxy points roughly follows lines of constant kinetic temperature.
The corresponding temperature value varies as a function of density n
and column density (N):
K for
,
whereas
-60 K for n = 0.3-
,
.
Only the high-density models imply a kinetic
temperature range covering the fairly narrow dust temperature range
33 K
52 K characterizing these galaxy centers
(Smith & Harvey 1996).
This can be taken as a suggestion that at least the molecular
carbon monoxide emission from galaxy centers arises mostly from warm,
dense gas as opposed to either hot, tenuous gas or cold, very dense gas.
Possible exceptions to this are NGC 278 and in particular NGC 7331, M 51
and NGC 4826 which occupy positions in the diagrams of Fig. 4 suggesting
low temperatures
-20 K and consistent with the
full density range including the highest densities.
For M 82, Stutzki et al. (1997) estimated from the directly observed
-
line ratio a density
and a temperature T = 50-100 K. This is in very good
agreement with our estimates. However, the I([CI])/
ratio of
three suggests an abundance N[CI]/N(CO) = 2, i.e. four times higher than
estimated by Stutzki et al. (1997), although not ruled out by their
results - see also Schilke et al. (1993).
Copyright ESO 2002