A&A 380, 615-629 (2001)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011468
J. S. Clark1,2 - A. E. Tarasov3 - A. T. Okazaki4,5 - P. Roche6 - V. M. Lyuty7
1 - Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London,
Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
2 - Astronomy Centre, CPES, Univ. of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK
3 - Crimean Astrophysical Observatory and Isaac Newton Institute of Chile,
Crimean Branch, Naucny, 98409 Crimea, Ukraine
4 - Faculty of Engineering, Hokkai-Gakuen University, Toyohira-ku, Sapporo
062-8605, Japan
5 - Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
6 - Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Leicester Leicester LE1 9RH, UK
7 - Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Universiteskii pr. 13, 119899 Moscow, Russia
Received 8 August 2001 / Accepted 18 October 2001
Abstract
We present high resolution optical spectroscopy and V band photometry
obtained during the period 1987-2001 for the Be star X Persei/HD 24534, the counterpart to the X-ray pulsar 4U 0352+30. We find that throughout this interval X Per is highly active, with significant photometric and spectroscopic variability. We identify one episode of complete disc loss during this period (1988 May-1989 June), characterised by significant
mag optical fading and the presence of purely photospheric H
and He I 6678 Å lines. Two further episodes of pronounced optical fading which did not result in the complete dispersal of the circumstellar disc were
also identified (1994 October-1995 October and 1999 November-present).
The emission line profiles of both H
and He I 6678 Å also show significant variability. Cyclic changes in the strength of the peaks in both emission lines are observed, with periods ranging from 0.6-2 yrs - we attribute these to the presence of a one armed density wave in the inner circumstellar disc. Additional structure at large projected velocities is also present in the He I line - suggesting the presence of a significant density enhancement in the disc near the stellar surface (the "double disc'' of Tarasov & Roche). The evolution of the outer edge of the H
emitting region of the circumstellar disc is followed during disc formation,
and is found to increase rather slowly. This observation, combined with the presence of the one armed density wave and the rate of disc
formation and loss all provide strong evidence for the hypothesis that the circumstellar disc of X Per
is a viscous decretion disc, with angular momentum being supplied by an as yet
unknown physical mechanism near the stellar surface.
Key words: circumstellar matter - stars: early type - stars: individual: X Persei - 4U 0352+30
X Persei/HD 24534 is the prototypical Be/X-ray binary system, a subset of High Mass X-ray binaries consisting of an early-type non-supergiant Oe/Be star and a compact, evolved companion. Oe/Be stars are characterised by the presence of emission lines in their spectra (typically H I, He I and low excitation metals such as Fe II) and a pronounced IR continuum excess due to free-free/free-bound (ff/fb) emission, both originating in a gaseous, equatorially concentrated circumstellar disc around the OB star. Given that the circumstellar disc acts as a reservoir of material for the compact object to accrete from, detailed knowledge of the long term behaviour of the circumstellar environment of the Be star is crucial to understanding the X-ray properties of Be/X-ray binaries.
X Per is classified as B0Ve (Lyubimkov et al. 1997, henceforth L97;
Roche et al. 1997, henceforth R97).
Recently Delgado-Marti et al. (2001) determined an orbital period of 250 days and eccentricity
of 0.11, implying an inclination of
23
-30
from RXTE data.
X Per has been observed to undergo considerable
spectroscopic and photometric variability in recent decades
(Roche et al. 1993, henceforth R93; Norton et al. 1991).
Photometric and spectroscopic variability is a relatively common feature of Be stars
- indeed Dougherty & Taylor (1994)
find that 18% of a sample of 125 field Be stars are variable at near-IR
wavelengths. This is interpreted as being due to
changes in the physical properties of the circumstellar disc surrounding the Be star,
such as density and/or geometry. A small subset of variable Be stars show far more
extreme behaviour, characterised by large (
1 mag) photometric variability
accompanied by dramatic changes in emission line profiles - in some cases varying from
pure emission to photospheric profiles and vice versa. These are
thought to be due to global changes in the circumstellar environment of the Be star,
such as the complete loss or reformation of the circumstellar disc -
referred to as phase changes. Given that
there is at present no accepted physical mechanism for the formation, support (and loss)
of the equatorial discs around Be stars such rare events are of considerable interest,
providing unique insights into the Be star phenomenon.
In this paper we present high resolution optical spectroscopy and V band
photometry of X Per over the period 1987 to 2000, encompassing the
Be
B
Be phase changes between 1987 July-1994 May and subsequent
disc activity. The paper is ordered as follows. Section 2 summarises the spectroscopic
and photometric history of X Per, while in Sect. 3 we present the optical spectroscopy
and photometry. Section 4 discusses the observed variability in the context of phase
changes in other Be stars, the implications of the behaviour of X Per for the
viscous decretion disc model for Be stars (Lee et al. 1991; see
also Porter 1999; Okazaki 2001) and the
interaction between the circumstellar envelope and the neutron star companion.
Finally, we present our conclusions in Sect. 5, and summarise the observational data in Appendix A.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
t (106 years) |
1.19 ![]() |
0.81 ![]() |
4.45 ![]() |
5.3 ![]() |
Given the variability shown by a significant minority of Be stars it it is important to place our current observations of X Per in the context of its long term spectroscopic and photometric history. These observations, dating from the turn of last century (e.g. X Per has been observed as part of the Univ. of Michigan study of bright Be stars since 1913) suggest that throughout this period X Per has been highly active, with significant spectroscopic and photometric variability.
Cowley et al. (1972) report that between 1913-1971 the Balmer lines were strongly variable - weak in the period 1913-41, becoming stronger towards 1946 before fading again by 1947, then strengthening to a maximum by 1962 and decreasing thereafter. Sporadic He I (4472, 4922 and 5015 Å) and weak He II (4686 Å) emission is present during this time. Brucato & Kristian (1972) also note that Fleming (1912) had reported P Cygni Balmer lines profiles "near the turn of the century'' - corresponding to a period of unusual photometric activity (Muller & Kempf 1907) - which differ from the double peaked line profiles typically reported for X Per.
Significant variations in the Violet (V) and Red (R) peak ratios of the Balmer and Fe II
emission lines were noted by Mc Laughlin in 1929, 1934 and 1936 (1937;
Cowley et al. 1972), a pattern which continued between
November 1957-January 1961, when Wackerling (1972) describes abrupt
changes in the V/R ratio of the Balmer and metallic emission lines - the
ratio changing from 1.5 in Feb. 1957 to
0.6 by the autumn of that year.
Systematic, cyclic variability was again observed in late 1959-early 1960
with the V/R ratio plot of H
shown in
Cowley et al. (1972) clearly showing the onset of cyclic V/R variability around
1960, with a possible period of around 10 years.
Following this period of activity in the 1960's X Per again displayed spectroscopic
variability around the time of it's discovery as an X-ray source in 1970. By 1971
clear P Cygni Balmer line profiles were again observed (Brucato & Kristian
1972), suggesting mass outflow from the system.
Observations by Galkina (1977, 1980, 1983, 1986a, 1986b) cover the time
interval from 1974 to 1982 (JD 2442369-2445326), when the longterm
lightcurve of X Per displayed strong variability, including an extended low photometric state in
1974-1977 (although H
is still in emission during this period),
further low states of shorter duration in 1979 and 1981 and high-luminosity phases in
1978 and 1980 (R93). Cyclic variability in H
was again observed between 1974-75
(Galkina 1980).
From these observations two distinct forms of variability appear to have been present in
X Per throughout the last century. The first is a cyclic variability in the peak ratio of the
emission lines of H I, He I and metallic lines with periods varying between
1-10 yrs, the second a long term fluctuation in the optical brightness (
6.7-6.1), accompanied
by changes in the strength of emission lines. These forms of variability have been observed in other Be
stars and have respectively been interpreted as the presence of a prograde one armed oscillation in the
circumstellar disc (e.g. Okazaki 1997), and as the phase changes briefly described in Sect. 1
(these findings will be further discussed in the light of our new observations in Sect. 4).
The observations presented in this paper come from a number of different sources and
are summarised in Appendix A, giving details of the source of the spectra and
basic parameters. The source of each spectrum is listed, and
corresponds to:
cr - Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Ukraine, 2.6 m, Coudé focus,
with GEC (pre-1995) or EEV (1995 onwards) CCD, resolving power 25000;
uk - either Isaac Newton Telescope, INT, La Palma, 2.5 m, Cassegrain
focus, Intermediate
Dispersion Spectrograph (IDS), various CCDs, low resolution
or JKT, Jakobus Kapteyn Telescope, La Palma, 1 m, Cassegrain focus,
Richardson Brealey Spectrograph (RBS) various CCDs, low resolution;
cz - Ondrejov Observatory, Czech Republic, 2 m, Coudé focus, Reticon
1800, resolving power 20000 (Vojtech Simon; priv. comm.);
fr - Observatoire de Haute Provence, France, 1.5 m, Aurelie
echelle spectrograph, EEV-CCD, resolving power 80000.
Finally the V band photometric observations presented in Figs. 7 and 8 were obtained with
a pulse-counting photometer (EMI 9789 tube) attached to the 0.6 m telescope of the Crimean
Laboratory of Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Nauchny, Ukraine (in addition to those data already
presented by R97).
The reduced spectra are presented in Figs. 1-3 (H)
and Figs. 4-6 (He I 6678Å) - note that the low resolution spectra are not shown - while we
summarise the observational properties of the lines in Figs. 7 and 8. In both Figs. 7 and 8 panel a
presents contemporaneous V band photometry while panel b presents the EW of the emission line in question.
Panels c and d of Fig. 7 presents the evolution of the peak to peak ratio and peak
separation for H
where both parameters have been measured by fitting (non-physical) Gaussian
profiles to the data.
Panels c and d of Fig. 8 present the peak position and separation for
He I 6678 Å, again measured by fitting Gaussians to the emission line profiles. We emphasise that
this procedure was simply adopted to standardise the measurement procedure; it should not be
interpreted as a physical model for the observations.
![]() |
Figure 1:
Normalised H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Normalised H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Normalised H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: Normalised He I 6678 Å spectra of X Per covering the period 1991 Jan.-1995 Feb. Axes are the same as Fig. 1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Normalised He I 6678 Å spectra of X Per covering the period 1995 Aug.-1998 Nov. Axes are the same as Fig. 1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: Normalised He I 6678 Å spectra of X Per covering the period 1999 Jan.-2000 Dec. Axes are the same as Fig. 1. |
Open with DEXTER |
In order to discuss the behaviour of these lines in relation to each other, and to the overall photometric behaviour of X Per we have divided the V band lightcurve into distinct regions, which we have called phases 1 to 4, as indicated in Figs. 7 and 8. These divisions were adopted after examination of the lightcurves and spectra and were chosen to mark significant changes in the properties of the data (and therefore the inferred properties of the circumstellar envelope).
Phase 1 (TJD
46500-48100; Fig. 1):
Covers the initial photometric bright state and subsequent fading (
mags. in
400 days) between TJD
47300-47700, when X Per enters into an extended
low photometric state (ELS).
:
Phase 1 is poorly covered spectroscopically (and no He I 6678 Å
observations exit for this phase), but
our data shows that prior to TJD 47237 the H
line is bright (
Å),
with a double-peaked structure and apparent V/R peak ratio variability.
The peak separation at this time is rather small (
140 km s-1).
After TJD 47237 the EW of H
is also observed to decrease dramatically, the end of this phase has been
chosen to coincide with the last time H
is observed in emission.
Phase 2 (TJD
48100-49937; Figs. 1, 2, 4):
Between TJD
48100-49100 X Per remains in the ELS, with
very low amplitude photometric variations (Percy 1992; R97), possibly
increasing in size towards end of this period. Between TJD
49100-49650 the ELS ends with rapid brightening
in the V band (0.6 mag in
550 days), peaking at
on TJD 49630. Unlike Phase 1 no plateau of
constant brightness is observed and the light
curve starts to decay on a similar timescale to that observed
in Phase 1 (
mag in
470 days; also see Figs. 7 and 8), although it does not reach the extreme observed in the ELS.
:
Phase 2 was defined to begin with occurence of the first detection of the photospheric
profile of H
,
indicating complete disc loss at this time (note that this occurs significantly later than
the commencement of the photometric ELS). This state persists for only a short time before emission is again
detectable, with the line having moved back into net emission by TJD 48554 (Figs. 1 and 7, Table A.1).
Initially detectable as a weak double peaked line profile with a large peak separation (
500 km s-1) the
intensity and EW of the line increases
linearly with a corresponding decrease in peak separation, until
TJD
49565 when the decrease ends and low level V/R variability is observed (although a periodicity cannot
be identified at this time).
He I 6678 Å: initially in absorption the line gradually
moves into emission (first observed on TJD 48851) with widely separated peaks and a central (photospheric)
absorption component. As with H,
between TJD
48851-49700 the peak separation decreases monotonically
with the underlying photospheric profile becoming visible in the line wings by TJD
49600 (Fig. 4).
The EW variability is more pronounced than for H
at this time, reaching a local minimum when star
is at maximum brightness (TJD 49630). By TJD 49708 there is infilling in the photospheric wings of the line and by
TJD 49762 the line has a pronounced 4 peaked profile as reported by Tarasov & Roche (1995). Subsequently,
as X Per fades in the V band the EW of the line increases to
-1.1 Å by the end of Phase 2.
Phase 3 (TJD
49937-51052; Figs. 2-5):
Phase 3 represents a prolonged period (3 yrs) of low level (
mag) photospheric fluctuations
on timescales of
100 days, ending with a dramatic brightening that signals the onset of Phase 4.
Spectroscopic observations at this time reveal significant activity during this time, although the peak separation
of the H
line remains
constant throughout this time (TJD
50293-51052).
:
pronounced cyclical V/R variability is seen throughout this period with three maxima observed.
Both the amplitude of variations and cycle length appear variable during this period with
356, 289 and 117 days for the descending branches of the 3 cycles present in Phase 3
(the last cycle extending into Phase 4), implying variable cycle lengths of
2-0.6 yrs respectively (see
Fig. 7). Throughout this period the EW shows small fluctuations of
2 Å about a mean level of
-10 Å
and the peak separation stabilises at
140 km s-1; the same value observed in spectra obtained prior to the photometric ELS.
He I 6678 Å: during this phase He I shows a complicated, multi-component structure, with
strong variability in both intensity and radial velocity for all peaks. Although the characteristic 4 peaked profile
observed at the end of Phase 2 has disappeared by the start of Phase 3, 182 days later, significant
emission at large velocities is found to persist throughout Phase 3 with identifiable peaks in the line profile
observed to migrate rapidly towards line centre (at a greater rate than the original peaks; Fig. 8).
Initially the stronger central emission peaks are observed to vary in intensity in the same manner as
H
before the motion of the outer peaks causes them to become indistinguishable, forming a variable 3 peaked
profile superimposed on a broad plateau of emission. Given the strength of the broad emission wings of H
we suspect that similar high velocity emission components may also be present (Figs. 2 and 3) in this line as well - however we are
unable to unambiguously deconvolve the line into its components. Given the rapid evolution of the He I
line profile, the seasonal breaks in observations between TJD 50139-274, 50504-658 and 50755-859 prevent the detailed study of the
evolution of individual emission peaks throughout Phase 3. Nevertheless, where temporal coverage is sufficient it appears that
both peak strength and position vary systematically, suggesting that the cyclic V/R variability visible in H
is also present
in He I 6678 Å, superimposed on a broad plinth of emission.
Phase 4 (TJD
51052-present; Figs. 3, 5, 6):
The final phase covers a second episode of large amplitude photometric variability, of a qualitatively different
nature to that of Phase 2. Beginning around TJD 51050 the V band abruptly brightens by 0.5 mag in only
190 days, compared to
400 day rise in Phase 2. A plateau lasting
1 yr is then observed followed by an
apparent slow decline in brightness in comparison to the abrupt, rapid dimming following the photometric maximum in Phase 2.
:
the cyclic V/R variability is observed to continue throughout Phase 4 with a highly variable amplitude
and apparent periodicity (
201 days for the descending branch of the first cycle
and the data are too sparse to accurately determine the period of the second cycle). The EW of the line is also
highly variable, reaching a peak value of
-17 Å some 400 days after the peak in the V band photometry. A
similar lag was also observed in Phases 2 and 3 and will be further discussed in Sect. 4.
He I 6678 Å: as with H
during this phase He I continues to show significant variability (possibly
associated with the V/R variability observed in the H
profile at this time), with a noticeable reduction in line strength
between TJD
51052-51475. During this period emission at large velocities is observed to decay, revealing the wings of the
underlying photospheric profile by TJD
51475. Subsequent observations
320 days later reveal a significant strengthening
of the line, with new emission visible at high velocities again obscuring the photospheric profile. This behaviour, seen during a
period in which the photometry indicates the star is fading, mirrors that seen during the similar photometric fade between
TJD
49600-50000.
![]() |
Figure 7:
Time variability of the main parameters of the H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
As can be seen X Per is highly variable throughout the period
1987-2001, with both the cyclic line variability and the phase changes between
Be
B
Be identified in the archival data (Sect. 2) present during
this time. Given that both cyclic V/R variability and phase changes appear ubiquitous for Be stars it is
useful to examine these data in the light of the prevailing theoretical explanations for these behaviours.
Of particular importance to the following discussion is the presence of the neutron star companion in a long
(
days), modestly eccentric (e=0.11) orbit (derived from pulse timing analyses of
RXTE observations; Delgado-Marti et al. 2001).
The orbital analysis of Delgado-Marti et al. (2001) further allowed the determination of the orbital
separation, axsini=454lt-s, and assuming a canonical mass of 1.4
for the neutron star companion
constrains the orbital inclination to
23
-30
(implying an orbital separation of 60-77
).
This also allows us to constrain the rotational velocity of the Be star - the projected rotational velocity of
km s-1 (Lyubimkov 1997) translates to an absolute velocity of 430-550 km s-1, or 81-105% of
the breakup velocity for
X Per - implying that if the orbital and equatorial planes are coincident the inclination of the
system must lie at the higher end of the range given by Delgado-Marti et al. (2001).
![]() |
Figure 8: Time variability of the main parameters of the HeI 6678 line. Panel a) displays the V band lightcurve, Panel b) displays the Equivalent Width (in Å), c) the radial velocity of the peaks (in km s-1) and d) the peak separation (in km s-1). Same symbols used as in Fig. 7. |
Open with DEXTER |
Disc loss & reformation has been observed for both isolated (e.g.
Cen; Hanuschik et al. 1993)
and binary Be stars (e.g. V635 Cas = 4U0115+63, Negueruela et al. 2001) although the precise
mechanism governing this behaviour and the support of the circumstellar disc is uncertain. Based on spectroscopic observations of
Cen Hanuschik et al. (1993) suggest that discrete mass ejections from the star - which are subsequently
circularised in orbit - are responsible for disc formation; Rivinius et al. (1998) suggest that these could result
from the superposition of several non-radial pulsation modes. For binary systems the presence of a companion is likely to
have a significant role in the evolution of a viscous circumstellar disc, truncating it and hence
preventing a steady state disc from forming - possibly leading to instabilities that could result in disc loss
(Negueruela et al. 2001; Negueruela & Okazaki 2001).
The data set presented allows us to investigate the long term evolution of the circumstellar environment of X Per, with
the two emission lines and V band photometry providing complementary diagnostics for the structure of the disc. The V band
continuum emission is likely to arise within the inner 2-3
of the circumstellar disc and provides a measure of the base
density of the disc.
Telting et al. (1998) modeled the U-L band photometry of X Per
between 1975-1995 with the Curve of Growth prescription of Waters (1986) and found the range of V band magnitudes
considered (
6.2-6.8) corresponded to changes in the base density of the disc by a factor of
20
between optical maximum and minimum (
gcm-3 for V=6.25). The origin of He I
6678 Å is less certain. Stee (1998) suggests that it is likely to be formed within the inner few stellar radii of the disc.
Comparing both line profiles during Phases 3 and 4 we find the typical peak separation of H
to be 70 per
cent of that for He I 6678 Å. Assuming a quasi-Keplerian disc this suggests that the radial extent of the He I
6678 Å emission region is roughly half that of H
.
Given that H
is intrinsically a much
stronger line this result is not unexpected as it originates from a more radially extended regions of the disc
(e.g. Stee 1998; Marlborough et al. 1997).
It is clear from Fig. 7 that the behaviour of H
and the V band continuum is rather complicated and that a simple
correlation between photometric magnitude and H
equivalent width (EW) is not present. In Fig. 9 we summarise this
behaviour by plotting the H
EW against V magnitude (panel a showing Phases 1 and 2, panel b Phases 3 and 4).
In order to follow the evolution of these physical quantities it is also useful to consider the peak separation of the H
profile which will reflect the bulk motion of the material in the outer disc. Under the assumption of a quasi-Kelperian
disc - appropriate for the disc radii considered here (Okazaki 2001) - this will provide a measure of the radius of
the emitting region. Although the H
emitting region is unlikely to ionisationally bound,
we cannot a priori assume that the peak separation of H
is due to a sharp density boundary
(i.e. the "edge'' of the circumstellar disc); it is more likely that it reflects the radius beyond which
the disc density is too low to contribute significant line emission,
which may or may not be due to a "discontinuous'' change in density associated with a disc "outer edge''.
![]() |
Figure 9:
Plots of the evolution of H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
During the disc loss in phase 1 (open circles) both line and continuum emission are observed to decrease, with
line emission still present in H
when the disc densities are too low to result in detectable excess optical
continuum flux from the circumstellar disc. The sole source of continuum emission at this time being the stellar photosphere
- resulting in the vertical evolutionary track in Fig. 9 which terminates at the point at which a purely photospheric
profile is observed and no contribution from the circumstellar disc is present.
Initially the data for Phase 2 (filled circles) follows the same vertical track as seen for the final stages of disc loss in Phase 1
- clearly as the disc begins to reform it has a rather low density. While it was not possible for Telting et al. (1998)
to determine the disc density gradient at this time, from the linear decrease in the H
peak separation at this time it
appears that the outer edge of the emitting region is increasing at this time.
Assuming an inclination, i=30
,
and a quasi-Keplerian disc the
radius of the H
emitting region grows from
1.1
-8.6
in the
2000 days from TJD 48554
(note that the intial peak separation of both H
and He I 6678Å is greater than twice the projected
rotational velocity of X Per, clearly indicating the transfer of angular momentum to the disc material).
We note that this disc growth time is comparable to the viscous
timescale at
.
The viscous timescale
is given by
,
where
,
H, and
are the
Shakura-Sunyaev's viscosity parameter, the disc scale-height, and the
angular frequency of disc rotation.
Adopting the stellar mass and radius on Table 1 and
(Telting et al. 1998) and
assuming that the disc is isothermal at
,
we have
for X Per. Thus, the viscous
timescale at
for
gives the similar
timescale to that observed.
Following the vertical evolution of the points in panel 1 (Fig. 9), the density in the disc becomes sufficiently large for
continuum emission to be apparent and
the increase in line flux is matched by the higher continuum, resulting in a constant
until optical maximum.
After this event the V band continuum is observed to decrease.
Given that the continuum emission is likely to be optically thin
at this wavelength, this likely represents a decrease in the density (and hence emission measure) of the disc.
During this time the
is observed to increase as a result of the lowering continuum, suggesting a
constant line flux. Given that the density in the
disc is observed to decrease at this time this suggests that either the disc is at least partially optically thick to H
(and hence the flux is proportional to the (constant) projected disc area) or that the material is preferentially lost at the inner edge of the
disc (which is responsible for the continuum emission) and not at the larger radii responsible for H
line emission.
During this period the He I line profile showed significant
variability (in addition to the cyclic V/R variability also present in
H;
Sect. 4.2), with the appearance of a 4 peaked line
profile. Once again the new peaks were observed to appear at projected
velocities clearly in excess of the stellar rotational velocity.
As with the original peaks, the outer peaks are also observed to
migrate to line centre (e.g. Fig. 8) suggesting the drift of the
emitting material to larger radii, although we note that for this
process appears to occur more rapidly than for the first set of
peaks.
Tarasov & Roche (1995) suggest this results from a nested double disc structure - however it is not clear that there is a region devoid of material in the equatorial plane, separating an inner disc from an annulus at larger radii. What appears more likely is that the density of material in the equatorial plane has increased at very small radii at this time and consequently the radial density gradient of the disc is not represented by a simple power law prescription (although we note that this is hard to reconcile given the reduction in strength of the optical continuum at this time which is also thought to arise at small radii). In this case, the migration of the second set of peaks toward the line centre results from the change in the radial density distribution toward a simple power law. This process is likely to occur more rapidly than the disc formation itself, which is traced by the change in the separation of the first set of peaks.
This process
continues throughout Phase 3, where it appears that the radial extent
of the H
emitting region of the disc remains constant. We
note again that this does not imply that the outer edge of the disc
has ceased to expand, rather that material outside this radius is too
diffuse to contribute significantly to line emission (likewise
material will continue to drift outwards through this region of the
disc). Both the V band flux and
show small variations
during this time implying changes in the structure of the disc. Given
the reduction in
at constant photometric brightness
(indicating a real reduction in line flux), followed by a short lived
increase (and subsequent decrease) in photometric magnitude at
constant
(Fig. 9; indicating changes in both line and
continuum emission) it would appear that a reduction in the emissivity
of the H
region (outer disc) can occur independently of the
inner disc (responsible for the continuum). Therefore the evolution
of the circumstellar disc cannot be understood as simply due to
changes in the base disc density, but must also involve variations of
the radial density gradient of the disc.
In a viscous decretion disc, the density distribution is expected to evolve as follows. In an early stage of disc formation, the density gradient is not a simple power law but is much steeper in the outer region than that in a steady disc (which has a spectral index of -2 according to Porter 1999 and Okazaki 2001). As the disc develops, the density gradient will asymptotically approach that seen in the steady disc if the mass is continually supplied from the star. If the mass supply from the star stops at some point, as we have seen in X Per, the disc begins to accrete. Since the viscous timescale is an increasing function of radius, the mass accretion onto the star preferentially occurs in an inner region. As a result, the density gradient will become flatter than that in the steady disc in the region where the mass is accreting. The radius of this region increases with time. Outside the accreting region, the density gradient will be steeper than, but asymptotically approach, that seen in the steady disc.
Throughout phase 3 we note that large amplitude V/R variability is present in the line profiles, indicating the presence of an m=1 density wave within the disc (see Sect. 4.2).
Finally phase 4 covers the final rapid photometric brightening, plateau and fade, presumably due to the sudden addition and
subsequent loss of material to the disc. Once again the behaviour of
can be
understood in terms of a variable continuum, the constant
during the brightening suggests an increase in line flux
that is proportional to the increase in continuum emission, while the increase in
during the subsequent fade mirrors the behaviour seen in Phase 2, with the flux in H
initial remaining
constant despite the reduction in the continuum (leading to an increase in
)
followed by a reduction in both
line flux and continuum (leading to constant
). During this period, the behaviour of He I 6678 Å mirrors
that seen in the phase 2 with a weakening of the line profile as the star brightens with the photospheric profile becoming visible.
This is followed by the appearance of new emission at high velocities during the photospheric fading, presumably indicating
the presence of a larger quantity of material close to the stellar surface. It is not clear whether this represents new disc material
ejected from the star or material back towards the star after the supply of material from star to disc has been "turned off''.
Cyclic V/R variability is seen in both isolated Be stars and in the
mass donors in Be/X-ray binaries, with periods typically ranging from
1-10 yrs for isolated Be stars (e.g. Okazaki 1997) and
shorter periods for the mass donors in X-ray binaries
(
months-few years; Negueruela et al. 1998). Kato
(1983), Okazaki (1991, 1997) and
Papaloizou et al. (1992) have proposed that these
variations are due to the precession of a one-armed (m=1) density
wave in a near-Keplerian disc around the B star. Based on 3D
radiative transfer calculations in discs with the m=1 perturbation
pattern, Hanuschik et al. (1995) and Hummel & Hanuschik
(1997) showed that the one-armed oscillation model agrees
well with the observed, long-term line profile valiabilities. The
m=1 mode is considered to be excited by a dynamical process of
viscosity,
-mechanism according to Kato (2001). In
general, inertial-acoustic oscillations with no node in the
vertical direction, such as the m=1 modes in Be discs, are
overstable in viscous, near-Keplerian discs (Kato 1978;
Kato 2001 for general discussion of viscous excitation of disc
oscillations; see also Negueruela et al. 2001 for
Be stars).
As mentioned in Sect. 2 transient V/R variability has been reported for X Per throughout
the period between 1913-1982, and we confirm that this trend has been present in H
during the period
of our observations commencing
1000 days after emission in H
was first observed (we suspect that similar variability
is also present in the He I profiles). The cyclic V/R variability has been present in all subsequent spectra, with the
amplitude of variability increasing throughout this period (
2300 days).
It is interesting to see even in a qualitative level whether the m=1eigenmode in the disc of X Per has characteristics consistent with
the observed features described previously. For this purpose, we
construct an unperturbed disc
model, solve the equations for the m=1 perturbation, and calculate
emission line profiles from the disc with the m=1 perturbation
pattern, by a simplified treatment described below.
We assume that the unperturbed
disc is steady, axisymmetric, and isothermal with temperature of
.
By the reason discussed in Sect 4.3, we
assume that the unperturbed disc is truncated at the 3:1 resonance
radius, where the disc particle rotates three times as fast as the
frequency of mean binary rotation, but neglect the other effect of the
compact companion on the disc structure. Moreover, although the
mechanism of confinement of the m=1 waves in discs around early Be
stars is not well understood, we assume that it is due to the
optically-thin line force in the form
(Chen & Marlborough 1994).
According to Papaloizou et al. (1992), we include the
quadrupole contribution to the gravitational potential around the
rotationally-distorted star, adopting
,
where
k2 is the apsidal motion constant.
We adopt Shakura-Sunyaev's viscosity prescription.
We use the cylindrical coordinates centred on the Be star primary.
First, we construct the unperturbed disc model.
Given the radial velocity component at the
stellar surface, the structure of the unperturbed disc is obtained by
solving the equations describing the mass, momentum, and angular
momentum conservation (see Okazaki 2001 for details). An
example of such a solution is presented in Fig. 10 for
and
,
where
is
the radial velocity and
is the isothermal sound
speed. The solid, dashed, and dash-dotted lines denote
,
,
and
,
respectively, where
is the surface density,
are the
azimuthal velocity, and
is the Keplerian velocity at
the stellar surface. Note that
,
,
and
.
![]() |
Figure 10:
Structure of the viscous decretion disc
with
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Next, we consider a linear, isothermal perturbation on the unperturbed
disc shown in Fig. 10. Our linearised equations for
the m=1 isothermal perturbations are the same as those used by
Negueruela et al. (2001) [their Eqs. (5)-(7)]. As
boundary conditions, we impose that the horizontal velocity
perturbation vanishes at the inner edge of the disc and
at the outer disc radius, where
is the Lagrangian
perturbation of pressure. Solving those equations with the boundary
conditions, we have the fundamental m=1 eigenmode shown in
Fig. 11.
The mode, which is confined to
and precesses in a prograde
manner, has a period of 2.5yr and the growth time of 5.7 yr, both of
which roughly agrees with the observed quasi-periodicity and the growth
timescale of V/R variation in the H
line. Given that the growth
time is proportional to
(Negueruela et
al. 2001), this agreement implies that the
viscosity parameter
in the disc of X Per cannot be much bigger or
smaller than 0.2. Recall that the same conclusion has been obtained from
the comparison between the disc growth timescale and the viscous
timescale (Sect 4.1).
As mentioned in Sect 3.1, the cycle length of the H
line
variability has decreased from
2.0yr to
0.6yr over three cycles in Phase 3. During this period,
the EW of the H
line was gradually decreasing and the V band
magnitude was fluctuating at a low level (see Fig. 7),
suggesting the disc structure was changing during this period.
Since the m=1 mode is more easily confined and has a higher
eigenfrequency in a disc with a flatter density distribution (e.g.,
Okazaki 1997), we suspect that the accretion of the inner
region of the disc caused a flattening in the radial density
distribution during this period.
![]() |
Figure 11:
Linear, isothermal m=1 mode in the viscous
disc given in Fig. 9. Both disc and mode rotate
counterclockwise. The contours denote the relative density
perturbation in linear scale. The solid (dashed) contours are for
the region with positive (negative) density enhancement. Arrows
superposed on the contours denote the perturbed velocity vectors
normalized by the unperturbed azimuthal velocity ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Finally, we calculate the emission line profiles, assuming that the
nonlinear perturbation pattern is similar to that of the linear
perturbation shown in Fig. 11. In order to
show how large the amplitude of the observed V/R variation is, we
adopt an extremely large amplitude, 90%, of relative density
perturbation and compare the resulting profiles with the observed
ones. We compute the Balmer-line profiles using the same method as
described in Okazaki (1996), but now we include the stellar
continuum and the deviation from the second energy level of hydrogen.
We assume that the stellar source function is equal to the Planck
function at
and that the deviation factor, b2, is
given by b2 = 1/W, where W is the dilution factor defined by
(e.g., Hirata &
Kogure 1984).
Figure 12 shows model Balmer-line profiles for
,
where
is the line optical depth from the unperturbed disc
when it is seen pole-on. The inclination angle i is 30
and
the velocity resolution of each profile is 10kms-1(the resolving power is about 30000 for the H
line), which
is about the same as the spectra presented in Figs. 1-6.
In the figure, the variabilities due to the m=1 perturbation pattern
is shown by profiles at eight different phases.
From Fig. 12, we note that
the line-profile variability due to the m=1 mode qualitatively agrees
with the observed V/R variations in the H
line. The profile as
a whole shifts blueward (redward) when the red (blue) peak
is the stronger, as seen in many Be stars.
Therefore, it is likely that the observed V/R variation in the H
line
in X Per is due to an overstable m=1 mode in a viscous decretion disc.
As the mode grows, the amplitude of the V/R variation increases. It is important
to note that the increase in the amplitude of the V/R variations in
viscous decretion discs is expected
to occur gradually (and exponentially), taking years to a decade,
because of a long growth time
of the mode. This is exactly what we have found in
the V/R variation in X Per (see Fig. 7c).
![]() |
Figure 12:
Variabilities in the Balmer-line profiles
due to the m=1 perturbation pattern
for
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
A closer look at the model profile, however, reveals that the agreement
is quantitatively not good at replicating some physical parameters. Despite the fact that
we have adopted an extremely large amplitude of perturbation, the amplitude
of the observed V/R variation in the H
line is still larger than
that of the model profile. The amplitude in the velocity shift of the peaks
is also larger
in the observed H
profiles (
10-20kms-1) than
in the model profiles (<10kms-1 for
).
We take this discrepancy in a quantitative level as evidence
that the m=1 mode in the disc of X Per has been highly nonlinear throughout
Phases 3 and 4, where the linear m=1 perturbation does not fit well.
To fully understand the long-term behaviour of the disc of X Per, we
need to perform a nonlinear simulation of the evolution of a viscous
decretion disc, which is beyond the scope of this paper.
Since X Per has a low orbital eccentricity (e=0.11) and a long
orbital period (
)
and the mass ratio
q between the neutron star companion and the Be star primary is low
(q=0.09), in the previous subsection we have safely neglected the
effect of the neutron star on the structure of an inner part of the
disc, to which the m=1 mode is confined. However, the neutron star
can affect the disc structure in an outer region. Below we discuss the
long-term effect of the neutron star on the disc structure.
Recently, Negueruela & Okazaki (2001) and Okazaki &
Negueruela (2001) studied the interaction of the Be disc
and the neutron star in Be/X-ray binaries by a semi-analytical
method, and found that the Be disc in Be/X-ray binaries is truncated
through the resonant interaction with the neutron star and that the
truncation radius depends mainly on the orbital parameters and the
viscosity. Although the orbital eccentricity of seven systems to which
they applied their model ranged between 0.31 and 0.88,
Okazaki & Negueruela (2001) also pointed out that the Be disc in
systems with very low orbital eccentricity is expected to be truncated
at the 3:1 resonance radius not by the resonant interaction but by
the tidally-driven eccentric instability, the same mechanism
that truncates accretion discs in circular binaries with
(e.g., Osaki 1996).
The implicit assumption they made is
that, in systems with very-low eccentricity, the resonant torque is
negligible compared to the viscous torque inside the 3:1 radius.
This always holds for circular binaries, where the resonant torque
becomes non-zero only at the 2:1 resonance radius. For ,
however,
this assumption is not trivial even if
.
Therefore, below we
apply their model to X Per to test this assumption.
In the model presented by Negueruela & Okazaki (2001) the viscous torque
is evaluated by the formula derived by Lin & Papaloizou (1986),
while the resonant torque is calculated at each resonance radius
by using the torque formula given by Goldreich &
Tremaine (1979, 1980) after
decomposing the binary potential into a Fourier series
(see Negueruela & Okazaki 2001 for details).
The criterion for the disc
truncation at a given resonance radius is that
the viscous torque is smaller than the resonant torque at that radius.
This criterion is met for
smaller than a critical value,
.
In Fig. 13, we plot
at several n:1
resonance radii. The resonant torques at the n:1 radii are stronger
than those at radii with other period commensurabilities located
nearby. The parameters adopted are the same as those adopted for
modelling the unperturbed disc and the m=1 mode in the
previous subsection, except that
is now a free parameter.
![]() |
Figure 13:
Critical values of ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Figure 13 shows that if the non-resonant torque does
not work, the disc of X Per will be truncated at the 2:1 or 3:1
resonance radius,
depending on whether
or
,
respectively,
and will not be truncated for
.
At the 3:1 radius, however, the non-resonant tidal torque, which is
responsible for the tidally-driven eccentric instability, is likely to
dominate the viscous torque irrespective of
.
Consequently, we
expect that the disc of X Per is truncated at the 3:1 radius for a
plausible range of
(
), as expected by
Okazaki & Negueruela (2001).
X Per appears to be one of a small group of Be X-ray binaries which are low luminosity persistent sources with small increases in X-ray luminosity even during "outburst''. (e.g. RX J0440.9+4431 and RX J1037.5-564; Reig & Roche 1999). X-ray monitoring of X Per during the period of these observations confirmed this trend; no major X-ray outbursts or variability was observed throughout this time. This behaviour can naturally be explained by the truncation of the decretion disc by the neutron star companion. Truncation at the 3:1 resonance radius makes a wide gap between the disc outer radius (0.47ax) and the periastron distance (0.89ax). This wide gap will result in disc truncation in this system being so effective that the neutron star hardly accretes any gas from the Be disc even at periastron - with the disc acccumulating most of the material ejected from the star - naturally leading to a low X-ray luminosity.
In the viscous decretion disc model, which we have shown naturally
explains many observed features of X Per, the disc forms in a viscous
timescale
.
Given that
for parameters for X Per, the disc
truncation is expected to begin to work at
12
yr after the disc formation begins. Before this
time, the disc evolution will be no different from that in
isolated Be stars, but once the disc truncation begins to work, the
density distribution will increase with time, making the radial
density distribution flatter than that in the disc around isolated Be
stars. As for our photometric and spectroscopic observations during
the period of 1987-2000, only the very recent observations could be
affected by the disc truncation if
.
Future
observations will reveal interesting features in the evolution
of the truncated disc if the Be star continues to supply material to
the disc.
We have presented the results of a 13 year spectroscopic and photometric monitoring
campaign for X Persei which show that throughout this period the star showed significant variability which we attribute
to changes in the mass content and distribution in the circumstellar disc. Our data show that there was one episode of complete
disc loss during this period which was quickly followed by disc reformation. The data also show the formation and growth of a
perturbation to the disc which we attribute to the presence of a one armed density wave. Lack of correlation between the strength
of the line and continuum emission demonstrate that disc variability involves (at least in part) a redistribution of material
within the disc, leading to changes in the radial density gradient, rather than changes in the base density of the disc with
a constant density gradient.
We interpret these observations semi-analytically as variations in a viscous, quasi-Keplerian decretion
disc around the Be star primary. From the timescale of disc growth we find a value for ,
the Shakura-Sunyaev viscosity
parameter, of
0.2. Adopting this value for the simulation of the growth and periodicity of a one armed density wave in an
isothermal Keplerian disc we find a timescale for growth of
5.7 yrs and a periodicity of
2.5 yrs,
encouragingly close to the observations. Changes in the periodicity of this wave can further be ascribed to a flattening of the
density gradient of the inner regions of the disc, qualitatively consistent with the expected behaviour of a quasi-Keplerian
disc if the source of angular momentum at the star/disc boundary is "switched off'' (note that we cannot provide a mechanism
for such transport of material and angular momentum from star to disc). Finally, the value of
is also consistent
with the truncation of the circumstellar disc well within the orbital radius of the neutron star companion, effectively
preventing the transfer of material onto the neutron star, explaining the observed low X-ray flux and lack of significant
flaring activity. We conclude that the viscous decretion disc theory for Be star discs explains, in at least a qualitive
manner, the observed properties of X Persei.
Acknowledgements
JSC gratefully acknowledges PPARC funding. AET gratefully acknowlege receipt of financial support from the Royal Society for collaborative work with the Former Soviet Union. We also thank Dr. V. Simon for providing valuable additional spectroscopic observations.
Here we list the basic parameters of the spectral data utilised in this paper.
Table A.1 summarises the H
observations covering 1987
to 1998 - the source of each spectrum corresponds to the key given
in Sect. 2.
Table A.2 summarises the HeI
6678 observations covering 1991
to 1998 - the source of each spectrum corresponds to the key given
in Sect. 2.
TJD | EW | V/R | TJD | EW | V/R | TJD | EW | V/R | |||
(Å) | (Å) | (Å) | |||||||||
47065.57 | cr | -11.75 | 1.64 | 49641.59 | uk | -6.69 | 1.03 | 51172.18 | cr | -8.45 | 0.87 |
47066.50 | cr | -11.86 | 1.59 | 49642.66 | fr | -7.14 | 1.01 | 51186.27 | cr | -7.89 | 0.95 |
47153.8 | uk | -8.9 | - | 49642.59 | uk | -6.52 | 1.03 | 51192.41 | cr | -7.37 | 0.99 |
47160.7 | uk | -9.3 | - | 49643.62 | fr | -7.12 | 1.01 | 51221.41 | cr | -6.58 | 1.15 |
47229.7 | uk | -12.0 | - | 49645.60 | cz | -6.61 | 1.05 | 51235.24 | cr | -6.37 | 1.22 |
47230.6 | uk | -11.7 | - | 49646.64 | cz | -6.45 | 1.04 | 51381.52 | cr | -7.07 | 0.87 |
47231.7 | uk | -11.3 | - | 49649.77 | uk | -6.83 | 1.04 | 51381.52 | cr | -7.07 | 0.87 |
47235.28 | cr | -10.05 | 1.36 | 49654.35 | cr | -6.90 | 1.11 | 51393.55 | cr | -7.39 | 0.85 |
47237.28 | cr | -10.33 | 1.33 | 49672.27 | cr | -8.10 | 1.06 | 51422.54 | cr | -7.38 | 0.83 |
47925.6 | uk | -1.3 | - | 49687.54 | cr | -7.92 | 0.99 | 51475.30 | cr | -9.18 | 0.84 |
47950.4 | uk | -1.14 | 1.03 | 49689.52 | cr | -7.85 | 1.09 | 51769.48 | cr | -16.52 | 1.60 |
48137.6 | uk | 1.6 | 1.00 | 49692.46 | cz | -8.12 | 1.00 | 51771.44 | cr | -16.89 | 1.56 |
48194.55 | fr | 2.71 | - | 49692.62 | cr | -8.28 | 1.12 | 51777.53 | cr | -16.22 | 1.57 |
48211.7 | uk | 2.7 | - | 49694.45 | cz | -8.09 | 1.01 | 51801.44 | cr | -16.74 | 1.67 |
48253.5 | uk | 1.93 | - | 49705.30 | cz | -8.92 | 1.01 | 51825.42 | cr | -15.60 | 1.65 |
48284.3 | uk | 2.2 | - | 49708.41 | cr | -8.80 | 1.02 | 51858.18 | cr | -15.74 | 1.50 |
48497.3 | uk | 1.4 | 1.00 | 49761.4 | cr | -11.81 | - | 51865.24 | cr | -15.26 | 1.64 |
48554.68 | fr | 0.31 | 1.00 | 49762.37 | cr | -11.7 | 0.93 | 51887.27 | cr | -15.86 | 1.63 |
48557.3 | uk | -0.05 | 1.01 | 49778.29 | cz | -12.67 | 0.94 | 51892.28 | cr | -16.25 | 1.64 |
48671.3 | uk | -0.93 | 1.00 | 49934.74 | uk | -13.90 | - | 51917.37 | cr | -17.43 | 1.52 |
48851.3 | uk | -1.18 | 0.96 | 49936.71 | uk | -13.59 | - | 51952.19 | cr | -16.94 | 1.54 |
48852.3 | uk | -2.91: | 0.94 | 49937.74 | uk | -13.91 | - | 52027.28 | cr | -15.48 | 1.23 |
48932.56 | fr | -1.600 | 0.99 | 49937.53 | cr | -13.73 | 1.40 | 52092.53 | cr | -15.63 | 1.18 |
48940.3 | uk | -2.50 | 0.99 | 49946.55 | cr | -14.24 | 1.45 | 52097.53 | cr | -15.52 | 1.14 |
49055.3 | uk | -2.58 | 1.02 | 49999.39 | cr | -17.10 | 1.37 | 52149.48 | cr | -15.04 | 0.99 |
49057.3 | uk | -3.03 | 1.01 | 50007.60 | fr | -16.03 | 1.42 | 52164.51 | cr | -14.34 | 0.95 |
49212.3 | uk | -4.46 | 1.00 | 50008.60 | fr | -15.60 | 1.39 | 52172.51 | cr | -14.71 | 0.90 |
49251.66 | cz | -5.75 | 1.02 | 50010.58 | fr | -15.62 | 1.42 | 52177.45 | cr | -14.43 | 0.91 |
49254.3 | uk | -5.51 | 1.01 | 50016.44 | fr | -15.64 | 1.31 | 52186.37 | cr | -13.51 | 0.87 |
49255.3 | uk | -5.31 | 1.01 | 50051.53 | uk | -14.37 | - | ||||
49296.48 | cr | -7.40 | 1.02 | 50052.32 | cr | -15.42 | 1.14 | ||||
49297.42 | cr | -7.60 | 1.03 | 50070.43 | cr | -14.99 | 1.15 | ||||
49305.47 | cr | -7.56 | 1.01 | 50100.27 | cr | -14.38 | 1.16 | ||||
49327.4 | uk | -6.18 | - | 50114.29 | cr | -14.01 | 1.07 | ||||
49335.43 | cr | -6.73 | 0.99 | 50140.24 | cr | -13.02 | 0.92 | ||||
49341.42 | cr | -6.47 | 0.98 | 50142.46 | uk | -14.39 | 0.97 | ||||
49358.15 | cr | -7.35 | 0.99 | 50143.41 | uk | -13.90 | 0.95 | ||||
49373.43 | cr | -6.719 | 0.99 | 50293.54 | cr | -11.28 | 0.73 | ||||
49386.42 | cr | -5.28 | 0.96 | 50324.50 | cr | -11.02 | 0.81 | ||||
49400.34 | cr | -6.60 | 1.02 | 50360.42 | cr | -11.63 | 0.98 | ||||
49401.39 | cr | -5.89 | 0.99 | 50393.58 | cr | -12.30 | 1.16 | ||||
49411.4 | uk | -7.57 | - | 50406.30 | cr | -12.04 | 1.30 | ||||
49413.31 | cr | -7.01 | 0.98 | 50430.38 | cr | -12.28 | 1.39 | ||||
49437.4 | uk | -6.72 | - | 50466.26 | cr | -10.96 | 1.53 | ||||
49438.4 | uk | -6.87 | - | 50479.26 | cr | -9.63 | 1.47 | ||||
49439.4 | uk | -5.30 | - | 50504.42 | cr | -9.76 | 1.35 | ||||
49565.55 | cr | -6.60 | 1.12 | 50658.52 | cr | -11.63 | 0.71 | ||||
49587.53 | cz | -6.30 | 1.08 | 50730.38 | cr | -10.25 | 0.66 | ||||
49588.53 | cz | -5.90 | 1.06 | 50755.29 | cr | -10.49 | 0.68 | ||||
49592.47 | cz | -5.41 | 1.05 | 50859.19 | cr | -12.19 | 1.03 | ||||
49599.54 | cz | -6.12 | 1.04 | 51006.54 | cr | -9.81 | 1.22 | ||||
49600.54 | cz | -5.81 | 1.05 | 51052.48 | cr | -9.40 | 0.91 | ||||
49612.4 | uk | -7.20 | - | 51098.43 | cr | -9.21 | 0.83 | ||||
49640.57 | fr | -7.10 | 1.01 | 51115.42 | cr | -9.72 | 0.78 | ||||
49641.37 | cr | -6.93 | 1.04 | 51121.43 | cr | -9.66 | 0.78 | ||||
49641.61 | fr | -7.05 | 1.00 | 51126.42 | cr | -9.72 | 0.77 |
TJD | EW | TJD | EW | TJD | EW | |||
(Å) | (Å) | (Å) | ||||||
48284.4 | uk | 0.85 | 49692.46 | cz | -0.04 | 50859.28 | cr | -0.979 |
48557.3 | uk | 0.25 | 49692.58 | cr | 0.064 | 51008.54 | cr | -0.703 |
48671.4 | uk | 0.49 | 49694.45 | cz | -0.02 | 51020.46 | cr | -0.763 |
48851.4 | uk | 0.07 | 49705.30 | cz | -0.11 | 51094.42 | cr | -0.730 |
48852.4 | uk | -0.22 | 49708.45 | cr | -0.111 | 51112.38 | cr | -0.845 |
48940.4 | uk | -0.12 | 49761.4 | uk | -0.46 | 51126.45 | cr | -0.907 |
49055.4 | uk | -0.26 | 49762.41 | cr | -0.339 | 51186.31 | cr | -0.419 |
49057.4 | uk | -0.21 | 49934.74 | uk | -1.13 | 51192.43 | cr | -0.347 |
49251.62 | cz | -0.25 | 49936.71 | uk | -1.20 | 51235.19 | cr | -0.050 |
49254.4 | uk | -0.25 | 49937.74 | uk | -1.05 | 51285.24 | cr | 0.018 |
49255.4 | uk | -0.26 | 49944.51 | cr | -1.342 | 51381.54 | cr | 0.204 |
49296.51 | cr | -0.416 | 49970.48 | cr | -1.883 | 51396.55 | cr | 0.046 |
49297.46 | cr | -0.482 | 49975.53 | cr | -1.891 | 51422.59 | cr | 0.081 |
49305.51 | cr | -0.458 | 50006.52 | cr | -1.622 | 51475.36 | cr | -0.105 |
49306.48 | cr | -0.484 | 50051.53 | uk | -1.33 | 51825.46 | cr | -1.121 |
49335.46 | cr | -0.187 | 50052.39 | cr | -1.413 | 51858.22 | cr | -0.904 |
49336.47 | cr | -0.177 | 50069.39 | cr | -1.522 | 51865.26 | cr | -0.780 |
49341.48 | cr | -0.233 | 50100.23 | cr | -1.334 | 51892.25 | cr | -1.007 |
49373.48 | cr | -0.083 | 50114.31 | cr | -1.280 | 51952.23 | cr | -0.995 |
49400.35 | cr | -0.089 | 50139.41 | cr | -1.414 | 52091.53 | cr | -1.180 |
49587.53 | cz | 0.06 | 50142.46 | uk | -1.38 | 52149.53 | cr | -1.132 |
49588.53 | cz | 0.02 | 50143.41 | uk | -1.20 | 52164.52 | cr | -1.051 |
49592.47 | cz | 0.10 | 50274.52 | cr | -0.823 | 52172.48 | cr | -1.079 |
49599.54 | cz | 0.06 | 50293.53 | cr | -0.891 | 52177.48 | cr | -1.062 |
49600.54 | cz | 0.04 | 50324.52 | cr | -0.875 | 52186.39 | cr | -0.883 |
49641.39 | cr | 0.076 | 50360.45 | cr | -0.981 | |||
49641.59 | uk | 0.074 | 50392.48 | cr | -1.011 | |||
49642.64 | uk | 0.104 | 50406.28 | cr | -0.987 | |||
49645.60 | uk | 0.15 | 50430.40 | cr | -0.991 | |||
49646.64 | uk | 0.07 | 50466.27 | cr | -0.720 | |||
49649.77 | uk | 0.051 | 50487.39 | cr | -0.381 | |||
49654.37 | cr | 0.086 | 50504.41 | cr | -0.380 | |||
49672.24 | cr | -0.037 | 50658.53 | cr | -0.827 | |||
49687.54 | cz | -0.03 | 50730.39 | cr | -0.508 | |||
49689.52 | cz | -0.03 | 50755.26 | cr | -0.571 |