Understanding the formation of structure in the Universe is one of the
most pressing questions in modern cosmology. The Sloan and 2dF surveys
currently in progress (Colless 1998; Gunn 1995)
will provide an accurate picture of large-scale structures in the local
Universe but presently our knowledge of galaxy clustering at z>0.5 is
poorly constrained. This is entirely a consequence of the technical
limitations in imaging and spectroscopic equipment, which (until
recently) have had fields of view 50 arcmin2; in all
cosmologies this translates to <1 h-1 Mpc at z>0.5. Covering a
substantial enough area to provide meaningful statistics on larger
(
10-20 h-1 Mpc) scales at higher redshifts (
)
has been
prohibitively expensive in telescope time. Consequently, many galaxy
clustering measurements made at these redshifts have been dominated by
the effects of sample variance, and also have only been able to
investigate the highly non-linear regime where the predictions of
theoretical models for the clustering of galaxies are strongly
dependent on the biasing schemes employed. Other studies, such as
investigating the variation of clustering amplitude by galaxy type or
intrinsic luminosity, or the accurate measurement of higher-order
statistics such as S3 have been even more challenging.
However, with the advent of wide-field multi-object spectrographs like
VIRMOS and DEIMOS (Le Fèvre et al. 2000; Davis & Faber 1998), in
addition to wide-field mosaic cameras on 4 m-telescopes, this situation
is changing. In this paper we detail a new survey, the Canada-France
Deep Fields (CFDF) project which has been carried out using the
University of Hawaii's wide field (
)
8K mosaic camera,
UH8K. This survey has targeted three of the original fields of the
Canada-France redshift survey (Lilly et al. 1995). In total the
CFDF consists of four independent deep fields, each of area
0.25 deg2. All of these have VI colours, three BVI and two and
a half UBVI. The survey reaches a limiting magnitude (
aperture) of
and at least one magnitude fainter in
UBV (Table 1). The
105 galaxies in the
survey, coupled with 1000 spectroscopic redshifts present throughout
our fields, allows us to investigate with unprecedented accuracy the
evolution of galaxy clustering to
(the survey's median
redshift at its completeness limit of
). Moreover, our
four widely separated fields also ensure that we can estimate the
effect of cosmic variance on our results.
To date, there have been many studies of
carried out
using deep imaging surveys conducted using charge-coupled-device
(CCD)-based detectors
(McCracken et al. 2000; Woods & Fahlman 1997; Hudon & Lilly 1996; Brainerd et al. 1994; Roche et al. 1993).
These works have generally focussed on one or two fields, usually
covering
50 arcmin2 each and typically reaching limiting
magnitudes of
.
Several authors have also attempted to
cover larger areas (>1 deg2) by mosaicing together many separate
pointings (Roche & Eales 1999; Postman et al. 1998), although
these surveys reach much shallower limiting magnitudes (
). In contrast, the CFDF survey, by virtue of its depth and angular
coverage, is able to provide an accurate measurement of
in the range
18.5 < IAB < 25.0.
Normally the results from these surveys have been interpreted in terms
of the "'' formalism first introduced to explain clustering
amplitudes observed at bright magnitudes on photographic plates
(Groth & Peebles 1977; Phillipps et al. 1978). With this approach, an
assumed redshift distribution
(or one measured from an
independent spectroscopic survey) and cosmology is coupled with a model
for the evolution of
(parametrised by
). In this
way it is possible to predict the amplitude of
at any
magnitude limit, based on these assumptions. One can then conclude
which value of
is most appropriate for any given set of
observations. Based on comparisons between
measurements in deeper CCD surveys and photographic measurements at
brighter magnitudes, many authors concluded that, for z<1 at least,
growth of galaxy clustering was consistent with
(Brainerd, Smail, & Mould Brainerd et al. 1994). More recently, direct measurements of r0(z) have been
attempted at z<1 using spectroscopic samples
(Carlberg et al. 2000; Small et al. 1999; Le Fèvre et al. 1996; Cole et al. 1994).
These works have demonstrated the importance of sample selection in
measuring galaxy clustering evolution;
has been shown to be
sensitive to the range of intrinsic galaxy luminosities and spectral
types selected. Attempts have also been made using photometric
redshifts computed using either ground-based or space-based imaging
data to measure the growth of clustering
(Teplitz et al. 2001; Brunner, Szalay, & Connolly Brunner et al. 2000; Arnouts et al. 1999a; Connolly, Szalay, & Brunner Connolly et al. 1998).
However, the finding that clustering amplitudes for Lyman-break
galaxies was similar to some classes of galaxies found locally
(Adelberger et al. 1998; Giavalisco et al. 1998) has provided the
clearest evidence to date that this simple formalism could not fully
account for the observations of clustering at
.
In this paper, the first in a series, we will introduce the CFDF
survey, explain in detail our data reduction strategy and demonstrate
its robustness. As a first application of this dataset, we will present
a measurement of the projected galaxy correlation function
.
The angular size and depth of the CFDF allows us to
make a reliable determination of
over a large
magnitude range (
). Moreover the four separate
fields allows us to make an estimate of the field-to-field variance in
the galaxy clustering signal. Finally we will discuss how appropriate
the "epsilon'' formalism is to describe the evolution of galaxy
clustering measured in our data.
In a future paper (Foucaud et al., in preparation) we will describe our
measurements of the clustering length r0 at
from a sample
of
2000 Lyman-break galaxies derived from the CFDF dataset. By
adding R- and Z-band data from the new CFH12K camera
(Starr et al. 2000) we expect to sufficiently increase the
accuracy of the photometric redshifts in the range 0<z<1 to allow a
direct measurement of r0(z) in this interval; however, in this paper
we will concern ourselves only with measurement of
and
its dependence on apparent magnitude and colour.
Copyright ESO 2001