Date | RA | Dec | R(AU) | ![]() |
E |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
see(
![]() |
sky(![]() |
exp(s) |
C/1999 F2 | |||||||||||
2000 June 30 | 17 05 | +30 45 | 5.512 | 4.728 | 137.6 | 205.3 | 63.7 | 7.3 | 2.1 | 20.2 | 240 |
C/1999 J2 | |||||||||||
2000 July 06 | 15 20 | +32 29 | 7.135 | 6.836 | 104.2 | 326.2 | 48.1 | 8.0 | 1.5 | 19.8 | 240 |
2000 July 09 | 15 19 | +32 03 | 7.136 | 6.868 | 101.9 | 326.1 | 47.7 | 8.0 | 2.1 | 19.5 | 240 |
C/1999 N4 | |||||||||||
2000 July 04 | 16 23 | +05 35 | 5.514 | 4.771 | 133.9 | 297.2 | 26.7 | 8.0 | 1.6 | 20.7 | 240 |
2000 July 06 | 16 21 | +05 32 | 5.515 | 4.794 | 132.0 | 297.2 | 26.7 | 8.0 | 1.4 | 19.8 | 240 |
C/1999 T2 | |||||||||||
2000 July 02 | 21 29 | +60 25 | 3.351 | 3.318 | 90.5 | 249.6 | 53.3 | 17.7 | 1.9 | 20.2 | 90 |
C/2000 H1 | |||||||||||
2000 June 30 | 15 27 | +48 18 | 3.890 | 3.643 | 96.4 | 347.4 | 66.7 | 15.1 | 2.1 | 20.2 | 240 |
C/2000 K1 | |||||||||||
2000 July 04 | 16 04 | +13 05 | 6.429 | 5.798 | 125.4 | 304.4 | 33.2 | 7.5 | 1.6 | 20.7 | 180 |
The overwhelming majority of cometary studies
are based on ground-based or space observations of bright comets
around or near to
their perihelion. Direct imaging reveals the inner
structure of the coma, which usually hides the
nucleus itself. There has been a small number of papers
dealing with distant (
AU) comets
(e.g. O'Ceallaigh et al. 1995; Lowry et al. 1999), and
consequently, there is a serious lack of information
on the behaviour of these objects. On the other
hand, time-series observations may give constraints on the period
of rotation and related effects (Jewitt 1992).
Optical photometry of sunlight scattered from the nucleus was first attempted by Fay & Wisniewsky (1978) on comet 6P/d'Arrest. The approach is identical to that used in the asteroid studies. Further CCD photometry using very small aperture radii has been used to study the rotation of some comets by Jewitt & Meech (1985), Jewitt (1990), Meech et al. (1993, 1997), Licandro et al. (2000a, 2000b). Licandro et al. (2000a) discussed in detail rotation and shape models based on the lightcurves. Additional reduction has to be done with respect to the seeing effects as the variation in seeing may cause a virtual light variation of the inner coma with an amplitude of some tenths of a magnitude.
The nucleus is usually well embedded in the coma and two basic approaches exist to determine the nuclear diameter. The most efficient one is the use of high spatial resolution observations of closely passing comets with the HST (e.g. Lamy & Tóth 1995; Lamy et al. 1998, 1999). The other commonly used method is observing distant nuclei in quiescence, when the coma is effectively absent (Luu & Jewitt 1992; O'Ceallaigh et al. 1995; Boehnhardt et al. 1999). Very recently, the nuclear thermal radiation of some comets was studied in the infrared with help of ISOCAM observations, resulting in independent diameter estimates (Jorda et al. 2000).
The new observing strategies by automatic telescopes (e.g. project LINEAR)
and dedicated large instruments (Hainaut & Meech 1997)
led to regular discoveries of relatively bright, large perihelion-distance
comets,
often more months or a year before the perihelion passage. Thus,
one can study cometary activity in such regions that were
unavailable even a decade ago. The main aim of our work is
to contribute to this topic with new CCD observations
of three comets located between 5.5-7.2 AU -
C/1999 J2 (Skiff), C/1999 N4 (LINEAR)
and C/2000 K1 (LINEAR). Beside the absolute
photometry we took
time-series observations in order to detect rotational effects.
The paper is organised as follows. The observations are
described in Sect. 2, while Sect. 3 deals with the
analysis and detailed observational results. A brief discussion
is given in Sect. 4.
Copyright ESO 2001