![]() |
Figure 1: H II region identification for NGC 1232. In this and in the following charts, derived from R-band FORS1 or FORS2 images, the slitlet numbers for the objects marked by squares correspond to those in Tables 3 and 4. The open circles mark additional objects observed spectroscopically, but not included in the analysis of this paper, because of the extreme faintness or the absence of emission lines. Orientation is North to the top and East to the left. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 2: H II region identification for NGC 1365. The gap in the FORS2 CCD mosaic runs horizontally. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 3: H II region identification for NGC 2903. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 4: H II region identification for NGC 2997. The gap in the FORS2 CCD mosaic runs horizontally. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 5: H II region identification for NGC 5236. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 6:
( Top) The combined spectrum of NGC 1232-07, showing the full extent
of the spectral coverage of our observations. Two different vertical
scales are used. The insets show zoomed-in portions of the spectrum,
where strong stellar features are located: Balmer absorption lines and
WR emission lines. ( Bottom) Portion of the spectrum observed in
NGC 1365-15, with the auroral lines [N II] |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 7:
( Top) The blue portion of the spectrum of NGC 2903-08, a
low-excitation H II region, as indicated by the weak
[O III]
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Comparison of reddening-corrrected line intensities (in units of H |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 9:
The electron
density-sensitive ratio [S II] |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 10:
The ratio
between the measured [O III] |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Nebular
diagnostic diagrams showing the excitation sequence of our sample. As
a function of |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 12:
The radial
distribution of the extinction c(H |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 13:
Comparison of statistical abundance indicators: R23 plotted against O3N2 ( top), N2 ( middle) and
log S23 ( bottom). The horizontal dotted lines show the
index value corresponding to the solar O/H abundance
[12 + log(O/H) |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 14: Oxygen abundance from statistical methods: the P-method (Pilyugin 2001) against O3N2 (Pettini & Pagel 2004). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 15: The radial oxygen abundance gradients in the 5 galaxies, estimated via the P-method of Pilyugin (2001). The deprojected radial distances of the H II regions are normalized to the isophotal radius of the parent galaxy. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 16:
The
temperature T(5755) determined from the
[N II] |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 17:
The S/O
( top) and N/O ( bottom) abundance ratio trends with O/H
for all objects in Table 12. A comparison sample, drawn
from Garnett et al. (1997, NGC 2403), Kennicutt et al. (2003, M 101) and
Bresolin et al. (2004, M 51), is shown by small full square symbols. The
solar values, indicated by the |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 18:
Same as
Fig. 17, but including only nebulae from the VLT sample
where the electron temperature has been computed from the
availability of at least one of the [N II] |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 19:
The
abundance indicator R23 as a function of oxygen abundance,
including all H II regions with measured [N II] |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 20:
Comparison between direct ( |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure A.1: The spectrum of a QSO from our MOS setup in NGC 1365. |