![]() |
Figure 1:
Test of the adopted procedure: comparison of
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Apparent effective temperature and surface gravity as a
function of |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Upper panel: corrections |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Equivalent widths of the He I 4481 and
Mg II 4481 spectral lines against effective temperature
for different |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Apparent |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Comparison between true and apparent |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Apparent and true |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 8:
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Comparison between spectra computed using pnrc (full
line) and apparent parameters (crosses). Pnrc spectra were
computed for
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Comparison between spectra computed using pnrc (full
line) and apparent parameters (crosses). Pnrc spectra were
computed for
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 11:
Abundance overestimation in dex due to stellar flattening
and gravitational darkening observed for different values of
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 12:
Comparison between spectra computed using pnrc (full
line) and apparent parameters (crosses). Pnrc spectra were
computed for
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 13:
Comparison between He I |
| Open with DEXTER | |