![]() |
Figure 1:
The planned layout and identification
numbers of the VIMOS pointings for the
VVDS "Deep'' survey in the VVDS-02h. A total of 66 pointings
is planned, placed on a grid with (2, 2) arcmin spacing
in ( |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 2: Distribution of slit length in 6 of the VVDS-02h pointings. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 3: Typical layout of spectra in the 4 quadrants of a VVDS-Wide pointing; more than 550 are observed on average. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Difference between the photometric I band magnitude
and the I-band magnitude computed from |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 5: Flux-calibrated VVDS spectra compared to the photometry of the VVDS imaging survey after scaling to match to the I band flux (black dots). The spectrophotometric accuracy is conserved over the full wavelength coverage at the 10% level. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 6: S/N per spectral resolution element over the magnitude range of the VVDS-Deep survey. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Spectrum of an absorption line galaxy
with
IAB=23.61, and z=3.2950, demonstrating the
ability of low spectral resolution |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 8: Redshift distribution of flag 2 objects (dashed), compared to the normalized redshift distribution of the flag 3 and 4 objects (open). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 9: Redshift distribution of flag 1 objects (dashed), compared to the normalized redshift distribution of the flag 2, 3 and 4 objects (open). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Comparison of spectroscopic redshifts vs. photometric redshifts
computed from BVRI photometry
for objects with magnitude
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Same as Fig. 10
for objects with magnitude
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 12: Distribution of galaxies observed in VVDS-02h. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 13:
Number and fraction of objects observed in the VVDS-02h,
compared to the total number of objects in the photometric catalog
with
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 14:
Difference in redshift measurements for 266 galaxies
observed twice in the VVDS-02h and 139 galaxies observed
twice in the VVDS-CDFS. The difference has a
Gaussian distribution with
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 15:
Difference in redshift measurements for 33 objects in
common between the VVDS-CDFS sample and the FORS2-GOODS observations
of Vanzela et al. (2004). The difference has a mean d
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 16:
Completeness of the
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 17:
VVDS spectra in the range
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 18:
VVDS spectra in the range
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 19:
VVDS spectra in the range
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 20:
VVDS spectra in the range
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 21:
Absolute
MBAB magnitude vs. redshift in VVDS-02h.
The full sample is shown together with the tracks of CWW templates
(Coleman et al. 1980) and starburst templates
used to compute the k(z) correction. At high redshift,
the bluest tracks (starburst galaxies) correspond to the
faintest absolute MB magnitudes. Each track has
been normalized to produce IAB=24at all redshifts. As redshift
increases, the computation of k(z) for the rest frame B band
becomes increasingly difficult to constrain, hence produces a
large range in B-band absolute luminosities for |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 22:
Redshift distribution for a magnitude-limited
sample of 3621 galaxies with
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 23:
Same as Fig. 22 for
5124 galaxies with
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 24:
Same as Fig. 22 for
7054 galaxies with
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 25:
Same as Fig. 22 for
9141 galaxies with
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 26:
Redshift distribution for galaxies in the VVDS-02h
field with
|
| Open with DEXTER | |