Table 2: Results for the NFW mass profile fits.
Cluster c200 R200 (kpc) M200 ( $10^{14}~ {M_{\odot}}$) R500 (kpc) M500 ( $10^{14}~ {M_{\odot}}$) $\chi^2_{\rm NFW}$(d.o.f.) [ $\chi^2_{\rm king}$, $\chi^2_{\rm MQGSL}$]a
A1983 $3.83\pm0.71$ $1100\pm 140$ $1.59\pm 0.61$ $717\pm 79$ $1.09\pm0.37$ 9.1(7) [31, 12]
MKW9 $5.41\pm0.67$ $1006\pm 84$ $1.20\pm 0.30$ $668\pm 51$ $0.88\pm0.20$ 3.6(8) [24, 5.2]
A2717 $4.21\pm0.25$ $1096\pm 44$ $1.57\pm 0.19$ $717\pm 26$ $1.10\pm0.12$ 16(10) [48, 52]
A1991 $5.78\pm0.35$ $1106\pm 41$ $1.63\pm 0.18$ $737\pm 25$ $1.20\pm0.12$ 10(9) [82, 33]
A2597 $5.86\pm0.50$ $1344\pm 49$ $3.00\pm 0.33$ $897\pm 29$ $2.22\pm0.22$ 14.6(8) [55, 6.8]
A1068 $3.69\pm0.26$ $1635\pm 47$ $5.68\pm 0.49$ $1060\pm 26$ $3.87\pm0.28$ 2.5(4) [62, 9.8]
A1413 $5.82\pm0.50$ $1707\pm 57$ $6.50\pm 0.65$ $1129\pm 33$ $4.82\pm0.42$ 8.0(8) [45, 3.7]
A478 $4.22\pm0.39$ $2060\pm 110$ $10.8\pm 1.8$ $1348\pm 64$ $7.57\pm1.11$ 9.5(10) [16, 30]
PKS 0745 $5.12\pm0.40$ $1999\pm 77$ $10.0\pm 1.2$ $1323\pm 45$ $7.27\pm0.75$ 2.3(6) [20, 20]
A2204 $4.59\pm0.37$ $2075\pm 77$ $11.8\pm 1.3$ $1365\pm 44$ $8.39\pm0.81$ 9.7(6) [14, 21]

a Chi-square obtained for the best fit of a king and a MQGSL model respectively (see Sect. 3.1).

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text