![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{2569fig1.eps}\hspace*{4mm}
\includegraphics[width=6.8cm,clip]{2569fig2.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2005/19/aa2569-04/img17.gif) |
Figure 1: Left: annular (projected) cluster temperature profiles. Right: deprojected, PSF-corrected temperature profiles. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
In the text
![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip]{2569fig3.eps}\hspace*{4mm}
\includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip]{2569fig4.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2005/19/aa2569-04/img22.gif) |
Figure 2: Left panel: integrated total mass profiles plotted in units of physical radius (kpc). The solid lines are the best fitting NFW profiles as detailed in Table 2. Right panel: scaled mass profiles of all clusters. The mass is scaled to M200, and the radius to R200, both values being derived from the best fitting NFW model. The solid black line corresponds to the mean scaled NFW profile and the two dashed lines are the associated standard deviation. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
In the text
![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip]{2569fig5.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2005/19/aa2569-04/img93.gif) |
Figure 3: Concentration parameter c200 versus the cluster mass M200. The solid line represents the variation of c200 for clusters at z=0 from the numerical simulations of Dolag et al. (2004). The dotted lines are the standard deviation associated with this relation. The dashed line represents the same relation at a redshift of z=0.15 (the maximum redshift for our sample). The long-dashed line stands for our best fit of the c200-M200 (see text). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
In the text