Astronomy & Astrophysics

All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=12cm,clip]{figs/Gl161-f1.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: a) Zoomed 15-40 keV ISGRI significance image made from a mosaic of 7 exposures from revolutions 0261 and 0263 (see Table 1). b) 3-10 keV JEM-X1 intensity image, with zoomed inset corresponding to the dashed area (diameter of main image is 10 $.\!\!^\circ$ 5). In both images a squared grey-scale, ranging from 0 to the peak pixel value ( $23\sigma$ for ISGRI, 4.4 cps for JEM-X1) has been used. It is clear that the INTEGRAL detections are co-located with the optical position of IGR J00291+5934 reported by Fox & Kulkarni (2004) (white cross) and not with the positions of other nearby sources.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7cm,clip]{figs/Gl161-f2.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 2: X/ $\gamma$ -ray spectrum of IGR J00291+5934 made with JEM-X1 from observation 0261-2 (circles), and an average of ISGRI observations (squares, see text for data selection). The line shows a simultaneous fit to the two sets of data with the CompST model.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7cm,clip]{figs/Gl161-f2.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 2: X/ $\gamma$ -ray spectrum of IGR J00291+5934 made with JEM-X1 from observation 0261-2 (circles), and an average of ISGRI observations (squares, see text for data selection). The line shows a simultaneous fit to the two sets of data with the `CompST` model.
Open with DEXTER