All Tables
- Table 1:
Flux densities, velocities and positions of individual
image components. Values have been determined by fitting Gaussian
profiles to the visibilities. Offset position (0, 0) is at the
assumed lens position specified in the caption of
Fig. 1. a Relative position uncertainties are based on
statistical noise and do not include astrometric errors. b Values
taken from the second observation campaign in 2003. c Values in
brackets are from the reanalysis of the P99 data, and do not include
data from 2003. d Velocities are relative to the redshift at
z =
1.4141. The CO(2-1) line parameters for the two A components were
not derived from the spectrum shown in Fig. 4 that was taken
between A-red and A-blue, but are based on spectra determined
at the respective positions of A-blue and A-red.
- Table 2:
Best fit parameters for Q0975+561. Parameters are:
right ascension,
declination,
velocity dispersion,
core
radius,
ellipticity,
position angle,
power law index,
shear term,
shear angle,
mass
of the black hole,
time delay,
magnification factor. a Offset from assumed lens position. bFixed parameters (shown in italic). c Values in brackets are
-tests with time delay. The reduced
is
defined as:
where
is
the degrees of freedom. d
is only taken for the
elliptical potentials (
)
where
is defined as the surface
mass density of the cluster in units of the critical surface density
(Barkana et al. 1999). For the spherical models,
and for
the elliptical ones it can be approximated by
,
i.e.
.
e based on Barkana et al. (1999). f
Based on Chae et al. (1999). g Determined for the
blue component.
- Table 3:
Apparent CO luminosity L' and molecular gas mass
of Q0957+561.
magnification
factor. b determined with the FGSE+CL model.