![]() |
Figure 1:
HST image
of LkH |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Top: contour map of the LkH |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Orbit fits to the motion of the
LkH |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 4: Top: the 2d power spectrum of Elias 1 from 2003.76. Bottom: a cut across the fringes, with a cosine fit. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 5: Top: contour map of Elias 1 made from the 2003 observations. Bottom: the position of the Elias 1 companion relative to the primary. The primary position is marked with a dot. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 6: Bispectrum speckle interferometry reconstructions of HK Ori. Contour plots on the left show the relative positions of the sources and wire-frame plots on the right illustrate the relative brightnesses. The components A and B are identified in the topmost contour plot. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 7: The position of the HK Ori companion B relative to the primary. The separate optical positions from 1995 and separate H and K positions for epoch 1997.8 have each been averaged to produce one position for each date. The solid line is a circle of radius 155 AU for an assumed distance of 460 pc centred on the primary. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 8: The SED of HK Ori's components. Data: open symbols stand for the primary and filled ones for the secondary. Separate photometric measurements for HK Ori A and HK Ori B from this work are marked with squares. Flux ratios measured by LRH97 and normalised to separate fluxes by reference to the composite photometry of Hillenbrand et al. (1992) are marked with triangles. For other points (diamonds), we have subtracted the model fit to HK Ori B from the total system flux as measured by Hillenbrand et al. (1992) to obtain supposed values for the flux of HK Ori A. We also show the 1.3 mm upper limit obtained by Henning et al. (1998), also with the flux of the HK Ori B model subtracted. In U, B, and V, the uncertainties result from the reported variability. At NIR wavelengths, the measurement uncertainties are of order 10% and are not plotted for the sake of clarity. Model for HK Ori A: a two-layer disk model by Lachaume et al. (2003), including irradiation by the central star and heating by viscosity fits the data very well at all wavelengths (solid line). For comparison's sake similar models, in which irradiation or viscous heating is turned off, are displayed (dashed line is without irradiation and dash-dotted line is without viscous heating). Model parameters are shown in Table 3. Model for HK Ori B: the SED of the secondary does not hint at an infrared excess, so a photosphere model is fit to the data (dotted lines). It should be noted that excess emission from distant reprocessing material cannot be ruled out. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 9: (H - K) vs. (J - H) colour-colour diagram showing the positions of the primary and secondary in the HK Ori system. Component A is shown with a circular point and component B with a triangle. The colours have been corrected for the effects of interstellar reddening. The main sequence (from Bessell & Brett 1988) and the direction of interstellar reddening are also shown. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 10: Top: contour plot of the V380 Ori system. Bottom: position of the V380 Ori companion relative to the primary. The solid line is a circle of radius 60 AU centred on the primary. The data point of LRH97 is shown with an open diamond. This position was obtained by LRH97 from data taken over a period of 3 years. Our data point is marked with a filled symbol. |
| Open with DEXTER | |