Astronomy & Astrophysics

All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[bb= 20 20 412 312, width=7cm, clip]{1502fig1.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 1: TReCS image of ChaH $\alpha$ 1 at 10.4 $\mu$ m. Note the smearing due to imperfect tracking.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[bb= 20 20 412 312,width=7cm, clip]{1502fig2.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: TReCS image of 2M1207-3932 at 10.4 $\mu$ m. Chop and nod amplitudes were larger than the field-of view ( $\approx$ $29\hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }\times 22\hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }$ ).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=8cm,clip]{1502fig3.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: SED and comparison of disk models for ChaH $\alpha$ 1. Measurements are diamonds, with associated error bars. The upper panel refers to small dust sizes (0.1 $\mu$ m), the lower panel to larger grains (2 $\mu$ m). Flared (full line) and flat (dashed line) model predictions are compared. The contribution of the BD photosphere is approximated by a black-body model. The dashed-dotted line refers to the disk model by Walker et al. (2004). Our T-ReCS measurements are shown with diamonds, while the ISOCAM data are indicated with boxes and the L' point with a triangle, respectively.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=8cm,clip]{1502fig4.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 4: SED and comparison of disk models for 2M1207.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[bb= 20 20 412 312, width=7cm, clip]{1502fig1.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 1: TReCS image of ChaH $\alpha$ 1 at 10.4 $\mu$ m. Note the smearing due to imperfect tracking.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[bb= 20 20 412 312,width=7cm, clip]{1502fig2.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: TReCS image of 2M1207-3932 at 10.4 $\mu$ m. Chop and nod amplitudes were larger than the field-of view ( $\approx$ $29\hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }\times 22\hbox {$^{\prime \prime }$ }$ ).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=8cm,clip]{1502fig4.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 4: SED and comparison of disk models for 2M1207.
Open with DEXTER