![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.2cm,clip]{0916.f11.ps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2004/43/aa0916/Timg110.gif) |
Figure 9:
Comparison of model predictions and
observations. Upper Panel: Strength of the 3.3 m feature
normalised to the FUV flux of the star for ZAMS stars. As in Fig. 8, the
scale on the upper axis is the spectral type, that on the lower axis
is the value of ,
i.e.,
the FUV field at 150 AU from the star. The two solid lines
show the predictions of the template model for
(lower curve) and
(upper curve)
(see text). The two thin lines show an uncertainty strip of
a factor of 2 around these models.
The crosses show observed intensities (normalized to the corresponding
FUV flux) for the isolated HAeBe stars with evidence of a flared disk, the
diamonds for the isolated HAeBe stars with no
evidence of a flared disk and the triangles for
the intermediate sources (HD 97048 and
Elias 1). The asterisks show the
HAeBe stars observed from the ground by
Brooke et al. (1993); the square is WL 16,
corrected for dust attenuation (see text). Error bars, when not shown, are
smaller than the symbols. Arrows are 5
upper limits.
Medium and lower Panels: Same as upper panel for the 6.2
and 11.3 m feature. |