![]() |
Figure 1: Colour-colour diagram for the NGC 5846 globular cluster system. The solid and dashed line mark the 15 Gyr and 2 Gyr isochrone respectively following the Bruzual & Charlot SSP model (Bruzual & Charlot 2000). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 2: Comparison between the SSP model isochrones given by Bruzual & Charlot (2000) ( upper panel), by Vazdekis (1999) ( middle panel) and Maraston (2001) ( lower panel). Different symbols mark the 1 Gyr (solid circles), 3 Gyr (open squares), 5 Gyr (open stars) and 15 Gyr (open triangles) isochrones. The solid line at (V-K)=2.7 marks boundary between blue and red objects (see Sect. 2.4). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 3: Least square fit of model isochrones given by Bruzual & Charlot (2000) ( left), Vazdekis (1999) ( center) and Maraston (2001) ( right). Various isochrones are marked with solid squares (1 Gyr), open stars (3 Gyr), solid circles (5 Gyr), solid triangles (10 Gyr) and asterisks (15 Gyr). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 4: Cumulative age distribution in the globular cluster systems of NGC 5846, NGC 4365, NGC 7192, NGC 3115, NGC 4478 and M 87. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Self-consistency test: age distributions of individual model systems
compared to the complete model set. The result of the |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 6: Comparison of colour-colour diagrams for the globular cluster systems and the HDF-S. Globular clusters are marked by filled circles and HDF-S objects by open squares. The solid lines mark the 1 Gyr and 15 Gyr isochrone respectively, as given by Bruzual & Charlot (2000). The box marks the colour range used for determining the cumulative age distribution. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 7: Colour-colour diagram for the HDF-S sample (K>21.5) before (triangles) and after (cross) applying shape parameter for selection. For selection the ellipticity (<0.2, left panel) and the star/galaxy classifier (>0.8, right panel) have been used. For final correction we choose a combination of photometric error, limiting magnitude and classifier. As in Fig. 6 the box indicates the colour limits. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 8: Cumulative age distribution in the HDF-S sample (BC00) normalised to 1 arcmin2 ( left: absolute, right: relative). The solid line marks the result if only a error cut of 0.15 mag for all filters is applied. Applying an additional ellipticity limit (<0.2) results in a age distribution indicated by the dashed line. Using a combination of error cut and star/galaxy classifier (>0.8) given by SExtractor (Bertin & Arnout 1996) most background galaxies can be rejected from the data set (dotted-dashed line). |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 9: Cumulative age distribution in NGC 5846. The left panel shows the cumulative age distribution before (triangles, dotted line) and after (open squares, solid line) correction for contamination applying an error cut as well as a selection by star/galaxy classifier. In the right panel the distribution has been normalised to the total number of objects in the sample after correction (125 objects within the colour limits). The age dating was done following the SSP models by Bruzual & Charlot. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 10: Cumulative age distribution (using BC00) in the globular cluster systems observed so far. The left panel shows the relative distribution without background correction. The correction applied in the right panel follows the procedure given in the previous section. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 11: Cumulative age distribution for modeled samples, consisting of a different number of objects but assuming a constant mixture of old and intermediate age objects (50%:50%). The results are shown for the BC00 ( left) and VA99 ( right) SSP models respectively. Each panel shows the age distribution for two out of six different runs of modeling. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 12:
Cumulative age distribution (using BC00) derived for models
of 10, 60 and 120 objects respectively. To show the importance of large
number of objects we show the standard deviation of the counting
rate. The models were created for a purely 15 Gyr old population
(solid circles) and a 50%:50% mix ( |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 13:
Examples of the reduced |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 14:
Cumulative age distribution in the globular cluster systems
using BC00 ( left) and VA99 ( right) SSP model isochrones. The samples
are corrected for background contamination following the procedure
given in Sect. 4.1. The horizontal line marks the
50 |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 15:
We compare the 50 |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 16: Left panel: colour-colour diagram for globular clusters in 4 different galaxies. The model grid follows the Maraston (2001) SSP model isochrones (ages between 3 and 15 Gyr following the age-arrow). The metallicity ([Fe/H] between -2.25 and +0.35) increases in direction of the metallicity arrow. Right panel: comparison of index measurements with the models by Thomas et al. (2003) (age range: 3-15 Gyr, metallicity range: -2.25-+0.67). Objects with spectroscopic ages below 5 Gyr are shown by solid circles. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 17:
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 18:
Result of the |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 19:
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 20: Age resolution for SSP model isochrones by Bruzual & Charlot (Bruzual 2000) in (V-I) vs. (V-K) ( left panel) and (U-I) vs. (V-K) ( right panel) colour-colour diagrams. The age splitting in (U-I) vs. (V-K) plots is increased by a factor of 2 and will therefore result in a better age resolution. For direct comparison we chose an uniform scaling for both plots. The difference in (V-I) and (U-I), respectively, between a 15 Gyr model isochrone and the one for 13, 10, 7, and 5 Gyr (from bottom to top) is shown here. |
| Open with DEXTER | |