![]() |
Figure 1:
The XMM-Newton view of the field of 1E 1207.4-5209.
Data from the MOS1 and MOS2 camera have been merged to produce the image. The exposure time is of |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 2: Period history of 1E 1207.4-5209. Circles are the Chandra measurements, crosses XMM-Newton. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 3: Folded light curve of 1E 1207.4-5209 in four energy ranges. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Ratio of the data to the continuum best fit models for 1E 1207.4-5209 (black points) and
for the bright quasar 3C 273 (grey points).
The EPIC/pn observation of 3C 273 (performed on 2001/06/13; pn operated in
Small Window mode with the Medium filter) yielded |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 5: Fit of the phase-integrated data. The model (double blackbody plus line components) is described in the text. From top to bottom, the panels show data from the pn, the MOS1 and the MOS2 cameras. In each panel the data are compared to the model folded through the instrumental response (upper plot); the lower plot shows the residuals in units of sigma. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Residuals in units of sigma obtained by comparing
the data with the best fit thermal continuum model.
The presence of four absorption features at |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Folded light curves of 1E 1207.4-5209. The energy ranges have been selected
in order to put in evidence the impact of the phase variation of the features
on the source pulsation.
The three panels to the left show that in the spectral regions less affected by the main features
the pulsed fraction is of order |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 8: Residuals in units of sigma obtained by comparing the data with the best fit continuum model (line components removed) for the phase-resolved spectra. The variations in width, depth and shape of the absorption features as a function of the pulse phase are evident. Structured residuals are observed in the range 0.4-0.7 keV for the "rise'' spectrum and (more significantly) in the range 0.9-1.2 keV in the "decline'', where broad emission features could be present. We did not attempt to model these structures, which are likely artefacts due to an inadequate description of the main absorption features' profile. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Combined V-band FORS1 image of the central region of the
1E 1207-5209 field.
The circles indicate the expected source positions computed from the
Chandra/ACIS (0.6'' radius),
MOS1 and MOS2 (2'' radius) data.
The good agreement among the three independent positions gives us confidence
on the overall correctness of our analysis.
No sources down to
|
| Open with DEXTER | |