![]() |
Figure 1:
Normalized UVES spectra of Q0100+13 showing the DLA Ly |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Velocity plots of the metal line transitions (normalized intensities shown by dots
with |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 3:
Same as Fig. 1 but for Q1331+17. The vertical bars correspond to the wavelength centroids of the components used for the best fit,
z = 1.776724 and
z = 1.786345, referring to the DLA system and an additional absorber, respectively. The measured H I column densities are |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 4: Same as Fig. 2 for the DLA toward Q1331+17. The zero velocity is fixed at z = 1.776370. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 5:
Same as Fig. 1 but for Q2231-00. The vertical bar corresponds to the
wavelength centroid of the component used for the best fit left as a free parameter,
z = 2.065774.
The measured H I column density is |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 6: Same as Fig. 2 for the DLA toward Q2231-00. The zero velocity is fixed at z = 2.066161. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
| |
Figure 7:
Same as Fig. 1 but for Q2343+12. The Voigt fit was performed with the H I column density measured by D'Odorico et al. (2002, Sect. 3.2) from the Ly |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 8: Same as Fig. 2 for the DLA toward Q2343+12. The zero velocity is fixed at z = 2.429942. |
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 9:
The nucleosynthetic abundance pattern of the DLA at
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 10:
The nucleosynthetic abundance pattern of the DLA at
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 11:
The nucleosynthetic abundance pattern of the DLA at
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 12:
Observed and predicted [Ni/Fe] versus [Fe/H] distributions in the solar neighborhood for
two different nucleosynthetic prescriptions for the production of Ni. The dashed line
corresponds to the model with
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 13:
Observed and predicted abundance ratios versus metallicity for the DLA at
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 14:
Observed and predicted abundance ratios versus redshift for the DLA at
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 15:
Observed and predicted abundance ratios versus metallicity for the DLA at
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 16:
Observed and predicted abundance ratios versus redshift for the DLA at
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
![]() |
Figure 17:
Observed and predicted abundance ratios versus metallicity for the DLA at
|
| Open with DEXTER | |