Astronomy & Astrophysics

All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=7.04cm,width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f1.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: Overview of the data flow within the GGOD software suite. Light coloured arrows refer to data input and output, to and from, the GGOD software. Dark arrows represent the flow of data between the components of the software. The ellipses represent the input data required by GGOD while the output data is represented by the rectangle. Internal data files are represented by hexagons.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f2.eps} \par\end{figure}$ Figure 2: Comparison of PICsIT shadowgrams for the PLGC position 2 (source shining through the SPI mask onto the IBIS detector plane). Simulation is on the left and real data (Calibration Run 4843) is on the right. The images are slightly offset due to inaccuracy in the supplied source position.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f3.eps} \par\end{figure}$ Figure 3: Comparison of PICsIT shadowgrams for the PLGC position 3 (source shining through the JEM-X mask onto the IBIS detectors). Simulated data is on the left and the real data (Calibration Run 4802) is on the right.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f4.eps} \par\end{figure}$ Figure 4: Comparison of PICsIT shadowgrams for the PLGC position 5 (on-axis illumination of IBIS). Simulated data on the left and real data (Calibration Run 4760) is on the right.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f5.eps}\par \par\end{figure}$ Figure 5: Comparison of PICsIT shadowgrams for the PLGC position 8 (source shining through the edge of the SPI mask onto the IBIS detectors). Simulated data on the left and real data (Calibration Run 4744) on the right.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f6.eps}\par \par\end{figure}$ Figure 6: Comparison of in-flight PICsIT single site spectrum (taken from empty field at the end of rev 38) with the pre-launch TIMM simulation.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f7.eps}\par \par\end{figure}$ Figure 7: Comparison of in-flight SPI single detector spectrum (taken from rev 13) and the pre-launch TIMM simulation (interactions within 8 $\mu$ sec are combined into one event). The broad spikes in the data in the 1.4-1.6 MeV band are electronic noise (see Roques et al. 2003 for a fuller explanation).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=10.5cm,width=5.25cm,angle=270,clip]{I... ...s[height=10.5cm,width=5.25cm,angle=270,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f8d.eps}\par\end{figure}$ Figure 8: Projection of the PICSIT_Y and PICSIT_Z axes of the PICsIT single pixel background events. Top to bottom are the simulation with veto on, real data wth veto on, simulation with veto off and the real data with veto off. In this co-ordinate system SPI and JEM-X are at negative PICSIT_Z. The real data, veto on and off, projections were not produced using equal exposures.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=7.04cm,width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f1.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 1: Overview of the data flow within the GGOD software suite. Light coloured arrows refer to data input and output, to and from, the GGOD software. Dark arrows represent the flow of data between the components of the software. The ellipses represent the input data required by GGOD while the output data is represented by the rectangle. Internal data files are represented by hexagons.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f2.eps} \par\end{figure}$	Figure 2: Comparison of PICsIT shadowgrams for the PLGC position 2 (source shining through the SPI mask onto the IBIS detector plane). Simulation is on the left and real data (Calibration Run 4843) is on the right. The images are slightly offset due to inaccuracy in the supplied source position.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f3.eps} \par\end{figure}$	Figure 3: Comparison of PICsIT shadowgrams for the PLGC position 3 (source shining through the JEM-X mask onto the IBIS detectors). Simulated data is on the left and the real data (Calibration Run 4802) is on the right.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f4.eps} \par\end{figure}$	Figure 4: Comparison of PICsIT shadowgrams for the PLGC position 5 (on-axis illumination of IBIS). Simulated data on the left and real data (Calibration Run 4760) is on the right.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f5.eps}\par \par\end{figure}$	Figure 5: Comparison of PICsIT shadowgrams for the PLGC position 8 (source shining through the edge of the SPI mask onto the IBIS detectors). Simulated data on the left and real data (Calibration Run 4744) on the right.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f6.eps}\par \par\end{figure}$	Figure 6: Comparison of in-flight PICsIT single site spectrum (taken from empty field at the end of rev 38) with the pre-launch TIMM simulation.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f7.eps}\par \par\end{figure}$	Figure 7: Comparison of in-flight SPI single detector spectrum (taken from rev 13) and the pre-launch TIMM simulation (interactions within 8 $\mu$ sec are combined into one event). The broad spikes in the data in the 1.4-1.6 MeV band are electronic noise (see Roques et al. 2003 for a fuller explanation).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[height=10.5cm,width=5.25cm,angle=270,clip]{I... ...s[height=10.5cm,width=5.25cm,angle=270,clip]{INTEGRAL29_f8d.eps}\par\end{figure}$	Figure 8: Projection of the PICSIT_Y and PICSIT_Z axes of the PICsIT single pixel background events. Top to bottom are the simulation with veto on, real data wth veto on, simulation with veto off and the real data with veto off. In this co-ordinate system SPI and JEM-X are at negative PICSIT_Z. The real data, veto on and off, projections were not produced using equal exposures.
Open with DEXTER