-
Articles citing this article
-
Same authors
- Recommend this article
- Download citation
- Alert me if this article is cited
- Alert me if this article is corrected
|
||||||||||||||||||
A&A 367, 27-32 (2001)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000357
The mass of a halo
M. WhiteHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
e-mail: mwhite@cfa.harvard.edu
(Received 1 September 2000 / Accepted 17 November 2000 )
Abstract
We discuss the different definitions of the mass of a halo in common
use and how one may convert between them. Using N-body simulations we
show that mass estimates based on spherical averages are much more tightly
correlated with each other than with masses based on the number of particles
in a halo.
The mass functions pertaining to some different mass definitions are estimated
and compared to the "universal form"of Jenkins et al. (2000).
Using a different simulation pipeline and a different cosmological model we
show that the mass function is well fit by the Jenkins et al. (2000)
fitting function, strengthening the claim to universality made by those
authors.
We show that care must be taken to match the definitions of mass when
using large N-body simulations to bootstrap scaling relations from smaller
hydrodynamical runs to avoid observationally significant bias in the
predictions for abundances of objects.
Key words: methods: N-body simulations
© ESO 2001
| What is OpenURL? |
- If your librarian has set up your subscription with an OpenURL resolver, OpenURL links appear automatically on the abstract pages.
- You can define your own OpenURL resolver with your EDPS Account. In this case your choice will be given priority over that of your library.
- You can use an add-on for your browser (Firefox or I.E.) to display OpenURL links on a page (see http://www.openly.com/openurlref/). You should disable this module if you wish to use the OpenURL server that you or your library have defined.

BibSonomy
CiteUlike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook