A&A 471, 361-380 (2007)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077312
Making maps from Planck LFI 30 GHz data
M. A. J. Ashdown1, 2, C. Baccigalupi3, 4, A. Balbi5, J. G. Bartlett6, J. Borrill7, 8, C. Cantalupo8, 7, G. de Gasperis5, K. M. Górski9, 10, 11, V. Heikkilä12, E. Hivon10, 13, E. Keihänen12, 14, H. Kurki-Suonio12, C. R. Lawrence9, P. Natoli5, T. Poutanen12, 14, S. Prunet13, M. Reinecke15, R. Stompor6, and B. Wandelt16, 171 Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK
2 Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
3 Institut für Theoretische Astrophysik, Universität Heidelberg, Albert-Überle-Str. 2, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
4 SISSA/ISAS, via Beirut 4, 34014 Trieste, and INFN, Sezione di Trieste, via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste, Italy
5 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata", via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Roma, Italy
6 Laboratoire Astroparticule & Cosmologie, 10 rue A.Domon et L.Duquet, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France (UMR 7164 CNRS, Université Paris 7, CEA, Observatoire de Paris)
7 Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley CA 94720, USA
8 Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720, USA
9 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena CA 91109, USA
10 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, USA
11 Warsaw University Observatory, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4, 00478 Warszawa, Poland
12 University of Helsinki, Department of Physical Sciences, PO Box 64, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
e-mail: hannu.kurki-suonio@helsinki.fi
13 Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 98 bis Boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France
14 Helsinki Institute of Physics, PO Box 64, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
15 Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, 85741 Garching, Germany
16 Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1110 West Green Street, Urbana IL 61801, USA
17 Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1002 West Green Street, Urbana IL 61801, USA
(Received 16 February 2007 / Accepted 29 May 2007)
Abstract
This paper is one of a series describing the performance
and accuracy of map-making codes as assessed by the PLANCK CTP working
group. We compare the performance of multiple codes written by
different groups for making polarized maps from PLANCK-sized,
all-sky cosmic microwave background (CMB) data. Three of the
codes are based on a destriping algorithm, whereas the other three
are implementations of a maximum-likelihood algorithm. Previous
papers in the series described simulations at 100 GHz (Poutanen
et al. 2006, A&A, 449, 1311) and 217 GHz (Ashdown et al. 2007, A&A, 467, 761). In this paper we
make maps (temperature and polarisation) from the simulated
one-year observations of four 30 GHz detectors of PLANCK Low
Frequency Instrument (LFI). We used PLANCK Level S simulation
pipeline to produce the observed time-ordered-data streams (TOD).
Our previous studies considered polarisation observations for
the CMB only. For this paper we increased the realism of the
simulations and included polarized galactic foregrounds in our
sky model, which is based on the version 0.1 of the PLANCK
reference sky. Our simulated TODs comprised dipole, CMB, diffuse
galactic emissions, extragalactic radio sources, and detector
noise. The strong subpixel signal gradients arising from the
foreground signals couple to the output map through the map-making
and cause an error (signal error) in the maps. Destriping codes
have smaller signal error than the maximum-likelihood codes. We
examined a number of schemes to reduce this error. On the other
hand, the maximum-likelihood map-making codes can produce maps
with lower residual noise than destriping codes.
Key words: cosmology: cosmic microwave background -- methods: data analysis -- techniques: image processing -- cosmology: observations
© ESO 2007

BibSonomy
CiteUlike
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Twitter