Online Material
Appendix A: Optical data
Table A.1: Optical observing log.
Table A.2: Comparison stars.
|
Figure A.1:
The comparison stars used to derive the differential photometry for DQ Tau. The figure shows the complete 15.6
|
| Open with DEXTER | |
Appendix B: Millimeter data
Table B.1: Julian day, flux, and uncertainty values for the millimeter light curve on 2008 December 28-29, recorded at a central frequency of 90.0 GHz with the IRAM PdBI.
Table B.2: Julian day, flux, and uncertainty values for the millimeter light curve on 2009 March 17, recorded at a central frequency of 90.0 GHz with the IRAM PdBI.
Table B.3: Julian day, flux, and uncertainty values for the millimeter light curve on 2010 January 11-12, recorded at a central frequency of 90.0 GHz with the IRAM PdBI.
Table B.4: Julian day, flux, and uncertainty values for the millimeter light curve on 2010 January 11-12, recorded at a central frequency of 92.5 GHz with CARMA.
Table B.5: Julian day, flux, and uncertainty values for the millimeter light curve on 2010 January 12, recorded at a central frequency of 238.5 GHz with the SMA.

BibSonomy
CiteUlike
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Twitter![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=9cm,clip]{15197fig9.eps}
\end{figure}](/articles/aa/olm/2010/13/aa15197-10/Timg73.png)